Dan Farrell wrote:
I'm not sure though... doesn't he want what the external peers sent to
his border routers, not just what the border routers decided were the
best routes?
That's the idea, yes.
Tom
Sounds like the behavior you are looking for is route reflection.
Eric
Tom Beard wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
i honestly don't understand your problem ;(
I get told that a lot ;)
Our two border routers (I'll call them B1 B2) both have full views
made up of various transit
Of
Eric Stockwell
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 4:19 PM
To: Tom Beard
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: bgpd best external route
Sounds like the behavior you are looking for is route reflection.
Eric
Tom Beard wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
i honestly don't understand your
Is there any way to mimic the behaviour of the Juniper
advertise-best-external-to-internal function within OpenBGPd?
I currently have a setup of 4 OpenBSD routers, two with eBGP sessions to
upstreams and peers, and a full mesh of iBGP sessions between these and
the two internal routers. This all
I take it you've already adjusted your holdtimes?
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Tom Beard
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:18 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: bgpd best
Dan Farrell wrote:
I take it you've already adjusted your holdtimes?
Yes, I've got them down to 30, but I don't really think it's the hold
times that are causing the problem. We're seeing ~180,000 prefixes from
one of the borders and ~12,000 from the other normally. It takes about
2 mins to
Henning Brauer wrote:
i honestly don't understand your problem ;(
I get told that a lot ;)
Our two border routers (I'll call them B1 B2) both have full views
made up of various transit peering connections. They have iBGP
peerings with each other and also with both of the access routers (I'll
7 matches
Mail list logo
