On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:53:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
yes the em0 ist member of the /22 network and the carpdev opion ist an old
setting from the start of this cluster
where i setup no ip on the interface.
should i try this ip balancing whitout this option ?
No, it's
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marco Pfatschbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 04.11.07 11:49:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: carp ip loadbalancing bug ?
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:53:46AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
yes the em0 ist member of the /22
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:17:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but we check our switches ( HP 2824 ) and my networker says that we have old
revision of firmware inside.
we will update this at monday and that we test it again.
I don't think that's necessary. It's not a bug in the switch.
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marco Pfatschbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 31.10.07 20:10:51
An: holger glaess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: carp ip loadbalancing bug ?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:26:48AM +0100, holger glaess wrote:
hi
i did the carp ip
hi
i did the carp ip loadbalancing setup as describe at the man page.
i did it on an full funktional carp cluster that means that carp an pf is ok.
host A:
inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 25 pass
office2world link0 link1 group lan_if
inet alias 10.100.1.253
holger glaess ??:
hi
i did the carp ip loadbalancing setup as describe at the man page.
is there an known issue ? maybee that carp ip loadblancing have problems with
/22 networks ?
CARP loadbalancing by IP requires that your switch sends traffic to the
common CARP IP to BOTH of your
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:26:48AM +0100, holger glaess wrote:
hi
i did the carp ip loadbalancing setup as describe at the man page.
i did it on an full funktional carp cluster that means that carp an pf is ok.
host A:
inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 25
7 matches
Mail list logo
