em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-16 Thread Jochen Fabricius
Hi all, today I discovered that my network connection on an Acer Aspire X3900 is only 10baseT. Never realized it before because the speed is enough (mostly relatively slow internet connection, no large files to/from other machines). System is 4.8-release. I checked: - wiring: even at shorte

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2011-05-25 Thread Jochen Fabricius
Hi, > > The following diff was just committed to -current which should fix > > this. > > thanks. I will test it in a few days and report. > finally I got some time to test it. It works. Below is the full dmesg and the ifconfig output. Thanks! Jochen Fabricius dmesg: OpenBSD 4.9-current

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-16 Thread Jeremy Chase
I'm just spitballing here, but have you verified that it is really 10baseT? I would do an experiment to see what ball-park transfer rates you can get on your LAN. It is possible that the output of ifconfig is incorrect. -- Jeremy Chase http://twitter.com/jeremychase On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:24

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-16 Thread Fred Crowson
On 16 November 2010 22:24, Jochen Fabricius wrote: > Hi all, > > today I discovered that my network connection on an Acer Aspire X3900 is only 10baseT. Never realized it before because the speed is enough (mostly relatively slow internet connection, no large files to/from other machines). System i

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-16 Thread Jochen Fabricius
Hi, > I'm just spitballing here, but have you verified that it is really 10baseT? > I would do an experiment to see what ball-park transfer rates you can get on > your LAN. It is possible that the output of ifconfig is incorrect. > > -- > Jeremy Chase > http://twitter.com/jeremychase > > netp

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-16 Thread Jochen Fabricius
Hi, > Hi, > > What does: > > ifconfig em0 media > > say? > > Fred > ifconfig em0 media em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr 90:fb:a6:46:db:e1 priority: 0 groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT full-duplex,rxpause,txpause) status: active

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-17 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Jochen Fabricius wrote: > Hi, > >> Hi, >> >> What does: >> >> ifconfig em0 media >> >> say? >> >> Fred >> > > ifconfig em0 media > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 >lladdr 90:fb:a6:46:db:e1 >priority: 0 >groups: egress >media: Ethernet aut

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-17 Thread Stuart Henderson
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: > The PHY is a 82578, and as I understand the commit messages the support is > still "basic", but shouldn't at least 100baseTX work? That's what all my > switches support. I have to check with a 1 GbE switch, but I don't know if I > can get one in the next ti

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-17 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:24:37PM +0100, Jochen Fabricius wrote: > Hi all, > > today I discovered that my network connection on an Acer Aspire X3900 is only > 10baseT. Never realized it before because the speed is enough (mostly > relatively slow internet connection, no large files to/from oth

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-17 Thread Jochen Fabricius
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:24:37PM +0100, Jochen Fabricius wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > today I discovered that my network connection on an Acer Aspire X3900 is > > only 10baseT. Never realized it before because the speed is enough (mostly > > relatively slow internet connection, no large files

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2010-11-17 Thread Jochen Fabricius
> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: > > The PHY is a 82578, and as I understand the commit messages the support is > > still "basic", but shouldn't at least 100baseTX work? That's what all my > > switches support. I have to check with a 1 GbE switch, but I don't know if > > I can get one in t

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2011-05-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010-11-17, Jochen Fabricius wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:24:37PM +0100, Jochen Fabricius wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > today I discovered that my network connection on an Acer Aspire X3900 is >> > only 10baseT. Never realized it before because the speed is enough (mostly >> > relat

Re: em(4) is just 10baseT

2011-05-02 Thread Jochen Fabricius
Hi, > The following diff was just committed to -current which should fix > this. thanks. I will test it in a few days and report. Jochen Fabricius