On Tuesday 02 March 2010 13:35:23 J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:06:46 -0500 and...@msu.edu wrote:
> > Quoting "J.C. Roberts" :
> > > And I thought I was expected to be inconsistent. ;)
> > >
> > > Anyhow, I was upgrading from the Feb 2, to the most recent
> > > snapshot, and fsck is
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:06:46 -0500 and...@msu.edu wrote:
> Quoting "J.C. Roberts" :
>
> > And I thought I was expected to be inconsistent. ;)
> >
> > Anyhow, I was upgrading from the Feb 2, to the most recent
> > snapshot, and fsck is coming up with a problem on one of my
> > partitions. I can pr
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:06 AM, wrote:
...
> I've seen the smart system report errors and have had them become
> true a few times, but far more often I've seen the damn things report
> "No proble, Boss" and then died a little later...
I seem to recall a USENIX paper from google (perhaps for the
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:27:50 -0500 "Brad Tilley"
wrote:
> > What I really want to do here is understand *why* some portion of
> > the disk has become unreadable?
>
>
> cd /bad_partition && dd if=/dev/zero of=big_file.zero bs=512
> conv=sync,noerror
>
> Let it run until it finishes. That won't
Quoting "J.C. Roberts" :
> And I thought I was expected to be inconsistent. ;)
>
> Anyhow, I was upgrading from the Feb 2, to the most recent snapshot, and
> fsck is coming up with a problem on one of my partitions. I can probably
> get it working ("fix" is such a strong word) with `fsck -fy` but
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:50 -0800, "J.C. Roberts"
wrote:
> And I thought I was expected to be inconsistent. ;)
>
> Anyhow, I was upgrading from the Feb 2, to the most recent snapshot, and
> fsck is coming up with a problem on one of my partitions. I can probably
> get it working ("fix" is such a st
And I thought I was expected to be inconsistent. ;)
Anyhow, I was upgrading from the Feb 2, to the most recent snapshot, and
fsck is coming up with a problem on one of my partitions. I can probably
get it working ("fix" is such a strong word) with `fsck -fy` but my real
concern is if the drive is
7 matches
Mail list logo