On 25/10/17(Wed) 12:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> [...]
> More help on fuse support would certainly be welcome, I think.
> It has not been actively maintained for some time.
Exactly. There are many way to help. It's not necessarily hard. Helg
Bredow has been looking at some issues recently. B
Thanks for the clarification.
Actually llfuse is needed by S3QL (http://www.rath.org/s3ql-docs/about.html). I
am considering migration to OpenBSD but this is blocker for now.
Do anyone know similar project that runs on OpenBSD? (needed options are:
Immutable Trees, Copy-on-Write and Encryption)
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:46:29PM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> llfuse requires FUSE 2.9.0 or newer, i think OpenBSD uses 2.6, am I right?
>
> thanks,
Yes, OpenBSD's API declares version 2.6. But it's not the same implementation
as on Linux. I don't know if even 2.6 support can be
Hi,
llfuse requires FUSE 2.9.0 or newer, i think OpenBSD uses 2.6, am I right?
thanks,
_
Zbyszek Żółkiewski
> Wiadomość napisana przez Stefan Sperling w dniu 24.10.2017,
> o godz. 11:44:
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Quick question: Any
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quick question: Any plans to support newer version of fuse?
>
> thanks,
>
> _
> Zbyszek Żółkiewski
>
Your question is not specific enough.
Hi,
Quick question: Any plans to support newer version of fuse?
thanks,
_
Zbyszek Żółkiewski
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
6 matches
Mail list logo