Re: fuse version

2017-10-25 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 25/10/17(Wed) 12:01, Stefan Sperling wrote: > [...] > More help on fuse support would certainly be welcome, I think. > It has not been actively maintained for some time. Exactly. There are many way to help. It's not necessarily hard. Helg Bredow has been looking at some issues recently. B

Re: fuse version

2017-10-25 Thread Zbyszek Żółkiewski
Thanks for the clarification. Actually llfuse is needed by S3QL (http://www.rath.org/s3ql-docs/about.html). I am considering migration to OpenBSD but this is blocker for now. Do anyone know similar project that runs on OpenBSD? (needed options are: Immutable Trees, Copy-on-Write and Encryption)

Re: fuse version

2017-10-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:46:29PM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote: > Hi, > > llfuse requires FUSE 2.9.0 or newer, i think OpenBSD uses 2.6, am I right? > > thanks, Yes, OpenBSD's API declares version 2.6. But it's not the same implementation as on Linux. I don't know if even 2.6 support can be

Re: fuse version

2017-10-24 Thread Zbyszek Żółkiewski
Hi, llfuse requires FUSE 2.9.0 or newer, i think OpenBSD uses 2.6, am I right? thanks, _ Zbyszek Żółkiewski > Wiadomość napisana przez Stefan Sperling w dniu 24.10.2017, > o godz. 11:44: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Quick question: Any

Re: fuse version

2017-10-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0200, Zbyszek Żółkiewski wrote: > Hi, > > Quick question: Any plans to support newer version of fuse? > > thanks, > > _ > Zbyszek Żółkiewski > Your question is not specific enough.

fuse version

2017-10-24 Thread Zbyszek Żółkiewski
Hi, Quick question: Any plans to support newer version of fuse? thanks, _ Zbyszek Żółkiewski signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP