-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Pascal Lalonde
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:37 PM
To: Laurent CARON
Cc: Steven Surdock; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:06:36AM +0200
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Pascal Lalonde
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:37 PM
To: Laurent CARON
Cc: Steven Surdock; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:06:36AM +0200
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:05 PM
To: Laurent CARON
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
...
yep, using ifconfig like that isn't really very clean -
does
-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:05 PM
To: Laurent CARON
Cc: OpenBSD
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
...
yep, using ifconfig like that isn't really very clean -
does this help at all?
Index
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:06:36AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
On 28/09/2009 04:28, Steven Surdock wrote:
...
HERE IS IFSTATED DETECTING THE FAILOVER, WHICH SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED ON
SEP 25, BUT DIDN'T
Sep 26 14:19:03 fw2 ifstated[16189]: changing state to normal
Sep 26 14:19:03 fw2
On 29/09/2009 00:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The only change to ifstated between 4.4 and 4.5 was a minor change
to the config parser. (there was another change after 4.5, so if 4.5
works for someone but -current doesn't, they can try reverting it).
Hi,
Here is what i temporarily did in the
On 2009/09/29 22:38, Laurent CARON wrote:
On 29/09/2009 00:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
The only change to ifstated between 4.4 and 4.5 was a minor change
to the config parser. (there was another change after 4.5, so if 4.5
works for someone but -current doesn't, they can try reverting it).
On 29/09/2009 23:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
yep, using ifconfig like that isn't really very clean -
does this help at all?
I did try to revert this change to no avail. :$
On 2009/09/29 23:12, Laurent CARON wrote:
On 29/09/2009 23:05, Stuart Henderson wrote:
yep, using ifconfig like that isn't really very clean -
does this help at all?
I did try to revert this change to no avail. :$
no, that's something different.
On 28/09/2009 04:28, Steven Surdock wrote:
Hmmm... I just upgraded a pair from 4.4 to 4.5 and I think I am having
the same problem you are seeing. Interestingly, I had a problem with
the upgrade a couple days ago and left ifstated running. It
transitioned, but not when I expected.
FORCE
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:07 AM
To: Steven Surdock
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On 28/09/2009 04:28, Steven Surdock wrote:
Hmmm... I just upgraded a pair from 4.4 to 4.5
On 28/09/2009 12:27, Steven Surdock wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:07 AM
To: Steven Surdock
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On 28/09/2009 04:28, Steven Surdock wrote:
Hmmm... I
On 2009-09-28, Laurent CARON lca...@unix-scripts.info wrote:
On 28/09/2009 12:27, Steven Surdock wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:07 AM
To: Steven Surdock
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: ifstated
...
On 25/09/2009 18:12, Steven Surdock wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:59 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: Steven Surdock
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On 25/09/2009 15:02, Steven Surdock
-Original Message-
From: Steven Surdock
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 7:33 PM
To: Laurent CARON
Subject: RE: ifstated with carp0
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Steven Surdock
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Laurent CARON
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 5:54 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: ifstated with carp0
I'm trying to setup ifstated to execute some scripts on state change
on
carp0
On 25/09/2009 15:02, Steven Surdock wrote:
I set net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on the primary ONLY for this reason.
It is the same if i disable net.inet.carp.preempt on the secondary, the
secondary 'thinks' he's the master carp device :(
-Original Message-
From: Laurent CARON [mailto:lca...@unix-scripts.info]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 11:59 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: Steven Surdock
Subject: Re: ifstated with carp0
On 25/09/2009 15:02, Steven Surdock wrote:
I set net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on the primary ONLY
On 25/09/2009 18:12, Steven Surdock wrote:
Odd, it works for me. Try a tcpdump and make sure both nodes are seeing
the carp announcements. Also verify advbase and advskew in the
announcements. Make sure both FW's are passing carp traffic.
-Steve S.
I guess both are seeing carp traffic
Hi,
I'm trying to setup ifstated to execute some scripts on state change on
carp0.
Here is my config file on both machines
*
init-state auto
carp_up = carp0.link.up
carp_down = carp0.link.down
state auto {
if $carp_up {
20 matches
Mail list logo
