Re: manual about jobs control

2012-04-11 Thread Samuel Martin Moro
On 04/11/12 01:23, f5b wrote: > In OpenBSD we can use commands like "jobs" "fg" or something else, but why > "man jobs" "man fg" not work? > > and are there anything about "jobs control" in the base Manual? > These are shell builtins. You may refer to your shell's man. Regards. -- Samuel Martmn

Re: manual about jobs control

2012-04-11 Thread Alexander Hall
f5b wrote: >In OpenBSD we can use commands like "jobs" "fg" or something else, but >why "man jobs" "man fg" not work? > >and are there anything about "jobs control" in the base Manual? Yup. man $SHELL

Re: manual about jobs control

2012-04-10 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:23:56 +0800 (CST), f5b wrote: >In OpenBSD we can use commands like "jobs" "fg" or something else, but why >"man jobs" "man fg" not work? > >and are there anything about "jobs control" in the base Manual? > man 1 ksh then /jobs or /fg Whilst there look at all the other b

Re: manual about jobs control

2012-04-10 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
f5b writes: > In OpenBSD we can use commands like "jobs" "fg" or something else, but > why "man jobs" "man fg" not work? Because they are shell builtins, thus documented in the ksh manpage. > and are there anything about "jobs control" in the base Manual?

manual about jobs control

2012-04-10 Thread f5b
In OpenBSD we can use commands like "jobs" "fg" or something else, but why "man jobs" "man fg" not work? and are there anything about "jobs control" in the base Manual?