Thuban writes:
> Default vi (nvi) in OpenBSD doesn't handle correctly most of UTF-8
> sings such as "é", "à" or so. One need to install nvi package to do so.
> Is it planned to replace the vi binary in the future?
> Is there any reason I can't think to keep this vi version?
nvi2's main deficiency
Thanks for enligthenment.
* Predrag Punosevac le [13-07-2018 10:06:19 -0400]:
> On July 13 2018 Thuban wrote:
> >
> > Default vi (nvi) in OpenBSD doesn't handle correctly most of UTF-8
> > sings such as "", "?? " or so. One need to install
> > nvi package to do so.
> > Is it planned to
On July 13 2018 Thuban wrote:
>
> Default vi (nvi) in OpenBSD doesn't handle correctly most of UTF-8
> sings such as "", "?? " or so. One need to install
> nvi package to do so.
> Is it planned to replace the vi binary in the future?
> Is there any reason I can't think to keep this vi
Default vi (nvi) in OpenBSD doesn't handle correctly most of UTF-8
sings such as "é", "à" or so. One need to install nvi package to do so.
Is it planned to replace the vi binary in the future?
Is there any reason I can't think to keep this vi version?
Regards.
--
thuban
4 matches
Mail list logo