Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Gustavo Rios
Thanks Stephen. On 7/27/05, Stephen Marley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:55:51AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote: > > I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to > > the standard implementation code of rpc. > > > > I don't feel like considering (as you

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Stephen Marley
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:55:51AM -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote: > I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to > the standard implementation code of rpc. > > I don't feel like considering (as you self said) garbage like corba, > rx, rxml-rpc > > I am considering rpc/xdr

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Ian Delahorne
Do you have any other suggestions where i could download alternatives for rpc? corba, rx, xml-rpc they all suck, just in different ways. /ian

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Gustavo Rios
I did not meant alternatives to RPC approach? i mean alternatives to the standard implementation code of rpc. I don't feel like considering (as you self said) garbage like corba, rx, rxml-rpc I am considering rpc/xdr but a different code implementation. Thanks for your reply. On 7/27/05, Ia

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Edd Barrett
> 0) Functions return 1 for success and 0 for failure (i don't like that); Surely thats too trivial to hold a preference to? Most languages do it this way though.

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-27 Thread Gustavo Rios
Sorry, but i found that code very ugly. This is just a personal feeling and i cannot explain why!! do i seem crazy, probably i am. I believe the code i saw was very poor design. But that's a personal taste only and should not be under jugdment. 0) Functions return 1 for success and 0 for failure

Re: openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-26 Thread Artur Grabowski
Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey folks, > > i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to > read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy, > cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller > and the "real" function th

openbsd & rpc/xdr

2005-07-26 Thread Gustavo Rios
Hey folks, i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy, cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller and the "real" function that do the job. So, i wonder if anybody knows an alter