Hello all,
I've looked over the ifconfig man page and can't find a way to set a specific
interface to PROMISC mode on 4.4, for example:
vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
Here's another example of that this possible:
sis0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
Is there a way to set the flags to PROMISC for an interf
not.
When I start up the 4 instances of snort, the nic (em0) with the ip
address shows up in promiscuous mode, the others do not.
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Fortunato
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've looked over the ifconfig man page and can't find a way to set a specific
> interface to PROMISC mode on 4.4, for example:
ifconfig can't be used to set an interface to promiscuous. You can
use something like tcpdump.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Fortunato
wrote:
...
> Is there a way to set the flags to PROMISC for an interface?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Philip Guenther
Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
without running tcpdump in the background if possible. (I'll take this as a
learning moment otherwise.) I'm trying to use the first vr[0-3] interfaces like
an L2 switch in this case.
-Original Mes
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Fortunato
wrote:
> Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
> without running tcpdump in the background if possible.
The interfaces are put into promiscuous mode automatically when
there's something that
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Fortunato
wrote:
> Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
without running tcpdump in the background if possible. (I'll take this as a
learning moment otherwise.) I'm trying to use the first vr[0-3] interfaces
li
-
>From: Matthew Dempsky
>Sent: May 19, 2009 4:21 PM
>To: Fortunato
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>Subject: Re: promiscuous mode
>
>On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Fortunato
> wrote:
>> Thanks, tcpdump does it alright, but I'd like to have promiscuous mode on
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:03:40PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Fortunato
> wrote:
> ...
> > Is there a way to set the flags to PROMISC for an interface?
>
> What problem are you trying to solve?
Although not the original poster, and this is not his problem,
Hi,
How to enable and disable the promiscuous mode with OpenBSD 4.3.
I didn't find the -promisc argument in ifconfig.
Thanks
M
On 9/19/05, Sean Kiewiet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> # ifconfig -a
> em0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
> em1: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> em2: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> em3: flags=8802 mtu 1500
> ...
> How do I get the other 3 ip-less nics to run in promiscuous mode in
> OBSD?
Y
On 03:43:49 Nov 18, Man Lam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to enable and disable the promiscuous mode with OpenBSD 4.3.
>
> I didn't find the -promisc argument in ifconfig.
>
man pcap
-Girish
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Man Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to enable and disable the promiscuous mode with OpenBSD 4.3.
>
> I didn't find the -promisc argument in ifconfig.
Why would you want to do that manually? Software that needs
promiscuous mo
ayer 2?
Is there anyway possible that this is 'legitimate' traffic?
Is there any other way to create a filtering bridge without putting
interfaces into promiscuous mode?
Thanks for any advice, would really appreciate it.
Steve
e' traffic?
damned unlikely. I think I'd be looking at a layer-1 solution if the
box can't be made to behave...
> Is there any other way to create a filtering bridge without putting
> interfaces into promiscuous mode?
you need promiscuous mode to act as a bridge.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2009/03/18 20:45, Mail Lists wrote:
>> >> Is there anyway possible that this is 'legitimate' traffic?
>> >
>> > damned unlikely. I think I'd be looking at a layer-1 solution if the
>> > box can't be made to behave...
>>
>> Sorry, I don'
On 2009/03/19 23:58, Mail Lists wrote:
> > Did you see what sort of packets they are? Broadcast or multicast or
> > something? I'm wondering why they would even hit your machine otherwise.
>
> They are multicast packets that are going to 224.0.1.24 which
> according to this:
>
> http://www.iana.o
y other way to create a filtering bridge without putting
interfaces into promiscuous mode?
Thanks for any advice, would really appreciate it.
Steve
This PR may be related:
http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yes&numbers=6072
Try setting up a blackhole route for multicast
Hi all
Some changes in VLAN-related code went into 6.6 and I think some of them
changed the way the parent interface gets into promiscuous mode. Let me
try to explain...
Our ISP provides internet and VoIP over two separate VLANs (100 and 101,
respectively). Our external firewall has two
the parent interface gets into promiscuous mode. Let me
> try to explain...
>
> Our ISP provides internet and VoIP over two separate VLANs (100 and 101,
> respectively). Our external firewall has two physical interfaces re0,
> and re1, and also does the filtering and NATing
g the
interfaces in promiscuous mode. Does this make any sense?
If so, is there an ifconfig flag I can use to accomplish this? Or should I
be looking at some other knob to tweak here?
--
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
m the link below for guidance:
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html#VMMnet
Everything works great, but the problem is that the host interface needs
to be put into promiscuous mode for the bridged vlan interface to pass
packets to the virtual machine. No packets can be passed to or from the
vi
e on the host machine, and created a bridge on
> it. I used option 4 from the link below for guidance:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html#VMMnet
>
> Everything works great, but the problem is that the host interface needs
> to be put into promiscuous mode for the brid
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, February 21, 2019 12:55 AM, Jordan Geoghegan
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has already been reported, or if it is indeed a
> bug, but the title pretty much sums it up.
Hi Jordan,
I have also reported this a while ago on this very same list and ende
24 matches
Mail list logo
