Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-21 Thread Siju George
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So this is still not the output I'd expect what does 'disklabel wd0' and 'disklabel wd1' say? Are wd0d and wd1d of type FS_RAID ?? nope :-( So that is the reason

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-08 Thread Siju George
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: In my dmesg at one point it says == Kernelized RAIDframe activated dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-08 Thread Greg Oster
Siju George writes: On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: In my dmesg at one point it says == Kernelized RAIDframe activated dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-08 Thread Siju George
On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Kernelized RAIDframe activated Searching for raid components... dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 RAIDFRAME: protectedSectors is 64. raid0:

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-08 Thread Greg Oster
Siju George writes: On 3/8/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Kernelized RAIDframe activated Searching for raid components... dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80 dkcsum: wd1 matches BIOS drive 0x81 root on wd0a rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302 RAIDFRAME:

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-07 Thread Siju George
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than you really wanted to know :) Later... Greg, Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-) In my dmesg at one point it says

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-07 Thread Greg Oster
Siju George writes: On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than you really wanted to know :) Later... Greg, Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-07 Thread Greg Oster
Siju George writes: On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than you really wanted to know :) Later... Greg, Seeing that you work on RAIDFRAME let me dare to ask you one more thing :-)

raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-05 Thread Siju George
Hi, The dmesg Output Shows Clean: Yes for both Raid Components as shown below raid0: Component /dev/wd0d being configured at row: 0 col: 0 Row: 0 Column: 0 Num Rows: 1 Num Columns: 2 Version: 2 Serial Number:

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-05 Thread Greg Oster
Siju George writes: Hi, The dmesg Output Shows Clean: Yes for both Raid Components as shown below raid0: Component /dev/wd0d being configured at row: 0 col: 0 Row: 0 Column: 0 Num Rows: 1 Num Columns: 2

Re: raid dmesg output and raidctl -sv output shows differrent status for raidframe mirror on OpenBSD 4.0 amd64

2007-03-05 Thread Siju George
On 3/6/07, Greg Oster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George writes: Is the Raid not working properly? It's working just fine... just probably telling you a bit more than you really wanted to know :) Thanks a million Greg :-) I really appreciate your Detailed reply :-)) Kind Regards