Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
I have a network where the core concists of openbsd devices using bgpd to
distribute
routing information. At present we need to use static routing if we connect
devices that
do not support BGP.
Regards Tony
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and
ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match from $peer1 inet prefix xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx prefixlen bla_bla set
rtlabel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:22 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW
insan.pr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
table.
Is this an error in the page or me reading it wrong ?
debatable... this could be worded better. with rtlabel foo, bgpd will
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
Is this an error in the page or me
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:20:45PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix to the kernel routing table with the specified label.
Index: bgpd.conf.5
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing table side and the daemons setting the
priority field to their respective
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general?
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 20:50]:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have
On 2008-06-17, Russell Howe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a pair of firewall routers running OpenBSD (4.1 and 4.2 at
present - need to get them updated) and I recently added an IPsec tunnel
to their configurations, using ipsecctl and ipsec.conf complete with
sasyncd.
This works fine,
I have a pair of firewall routers running OpenBSD (4.1 and 4.2 at
present - need to get them updated) and I recently added an IPsec tunnel
to their configurations, using ipsecctl and ipsec.conf complete with
sasyncd.
This works fine, and the host which is master of the carp interface I've
to the kernel thread known
as reaper man.
Q: running ospf with all peers + carp intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above let BGP and OSPF
play along
and ospfd gets to say hello to the kernel thread known
as reaper man.
Q: running ospf with all peers + carp intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above
at a time.
Q: running ospf with all peers + carp intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above let BGP and OSPF
play along in the same way
intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above let BGP and OSPF
play along in the same way a 'redistribute ospf' in Zebra/Cisco IOS
A: ?
redistribute
* per engelbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-02 00:52]:
I've made a setup with two identical bgp routers. On each router there's
3 peers (BGP and eBGP), one failover (carp/iBGP/ospf) interconnecting
these routers and finally pipes backwards to the internal nets. Part of
bgpd.conf further
intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above let BGP and OSPF
play along in the same way a 'redistribute ospf' in Zebra/Cisco IOS
A: ?
Q: default
intfaces in area 0.0.0.0 and
internal intfaces in area 0.0.0.1 (and from ospfd.conf)
[...]
fib-update yes
redistribute connected
[...]
This is about redistributing routes - will the above let BGP and OSPF
play along in the same way a 'redistribute ospf' in Zebra/Cisco IOS
A: ?
Q: default
22 matches
Mail list logo
