Re: spamd DB_SCAN_INTERVAL

* Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-31 12:21]: > > Probably Bad things. > > Oh-oh... I increased it to 2 minutes. Thing are a bit better now. > > > Shouldn't be. What rev of openbsd are you running this spamd box on? > > I run it on a single ide drive, I'm probably bigger than you

Re: spamd DB_SCAN_INTERVAL

> Probably Bad things. Oh-oh... I increased it to 2 minutes. Thing are a bit better now. > Shouldn't be. What rev of openbsd are you running this spamd box on? > I run it on a single ide drive, I'm probably bigger than your site. Really? We get mail for different companies... Even t

Re: spamd DB_SCAN_INTERVAL

* Tom Bombadil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-30 13:56]: > Hi all... > > What happens if we change "#define DB_SCAN_INTERVAL 60" to 600 in > /usr/src/libexec/spamd/grey.h? > Probably Bad things. > Sorry, I'm no C coder... > > Basically we just want to spread out table scans for now until

spamd DB_SCAN_INTERVAL

Hi all... What happens if we change "#define DB_SCAN_INTERVAL 60" to 600 in /usr/src/libexec/spamd/grey.h? Sorry, I'm no C coder... Basically we just want to spread out table scans for now until we get new hardware in, because it's fairly heavy on an single IDE drive. Does DB_SCAN_INTERVAL have