To all who tested, a fix for this is in the mail watch for it.
Here is some output demonstrating it working on a borowed Acer Aspire 5000. It
is
still ugly and needs work but I can verify it working. Currently you will
experiance a delay of one second when transitioning between states there is
hi there,
poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
is 2 - 3 times slower than rcp, and sftp is 2 to 3 times slower than
ftp. This is because
Hello.
Ref the new bioctl RAID management inteface.
Has the Dell perc3/dc and the megaraid elite 1600 been tested and proved to
work as I need to get a machine with supported RAID.
Regards...Martin
Hi misc@
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
presence of LAN behind NAT?
scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc@
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
presence of LAN behind NAT?
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc@
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
presence of LAN behind NAT?
yeah,
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
scrub on $ext_if min-ttl 255
On 10/30/05, Alexey S. Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc@
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order to hide
presence of LAN behind NAT?
hmm... but if
On 2005/10/30 19:50:10, Alexey S. Malyshev wrote:
How to set TTL to certain value on a certain interface in order
to hide presence of LAN behind NAT?
Does min-ttl do what you want? See pf.conf(5).
That's why you set min-ttl to it's highest value. You could also look
at 'reassemble tcp'. It modifies ttl setting in the session as well.
But it's meant more for normalizing traffic.
-Geoff
Alexey S. Malyshev wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:00:25 -0500
Jeff Quast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:17:21 -0800
Geoff Sweet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why you set min-ttl to it's highest value. You could also look
at 'reassemble tcp'. It modifies ttl setting in the session as well.
But it's meant more for normalizing traffic.
look that:
- WinXP - scrubed
- FreeBSD - passing
+ WinXP - passing
+ FreeBSD - scrubed
On 10/29/05, PARAMVIR DHINDSA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
29.10.2005
Dear Sir,
I installed the OpenBSD 3.7 on my Compaq PC. I'm
facing a problem. The CPU fan runs constantly
(non-stop) whenever I boot on OpenBSD which has become
a nuisance for me as well as
On 10/30/05, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but a couple of months ago a link appeared here describing a HPN
(as in hihg performance enabled) ssh patch. i kept that mail for
a very long time because i was very much interested in the answers
of the ssh developers, but there was none.
paul,
when I purchsed 3 there were all kinds of problems with
loading on a laptop
Now I purchsed 3.7 and it looks like this is the final end of
the road
for openbsd and me
I tolerated figuring out the wireless settings and even
though there is
some reason for a huge time lag installing packages
You should find somebody local that has a bit of experience, as you
are having problems that others do not have. btinternet.com is in
the UK, so you might try our two UK user groups, at
http://www.openbsd.org/groups.html#United
(If you're in another country, go to the top of the page and find
Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
one of the things he wants is to get an OpenBSD router to not decrement
the TTL for packets that it is forwarding. That behavior seems to me
to be against RFCs, but I'll ask on the off chance that it's there:
is there an
But CPU fan (constantly running) has never been a
problem on MS-Windows and FreeDOS. In fact it seldom
runs on these OSs if never. Can the problem be
resolved with some configurable settings in OpenBSD?
--- Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if your fans are controlled by acpi, there's not
frantisek holop wrote:
but a couple of months ago a link appeared here describing a HPN
(as in hihg performance enabled) ssh patch. i kept that mail for
a very long time because i was very much interested in the answers
of the ssh developers, but there was none. and so i assumed it must
be
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Matthew Weigel wrote:
SNIP
HPN-SSH improves OpenSSH performance in situations that you and I don't
deal with. Maybe I'm mistaken... do you have an OC-3 connection you're
trying to scp files across? If you are dealing with T-1s and 100Mbps
nope, but will OC-48 or 10G
--On 30 October 2005 11:25 -0800, PARAMVIR DHINDSA wrote:
But CPU fan (constantly running) has never been a
problem on MS-Windows and FreeDOS. In fact it seldom
runs on these OSs if never. Can the problem be
resolved with some configurable settings in OpenBSD?
Your fans are probably
frantisek holop wrote:
so before anyone tags this mail as a trolling flamebait
(which it is not), i just would like to ask
-have others tried HPN-SSH?
-have ssh developers tried it?
-or simply, has ssh hit its performance limit and can't get any better?
the HPN patch greatly improves
frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
is 2 - 3 times slower than rcp, and sftp is 2 to 3 times slower
Hello.
I want to set up tunnel between 2 networks
192.168.40.0/28 and 192.168.1.0/24 like bellow:
(a.a.a.a)pubIP--(NAT)gw1--172.16.0.0/12--(NAT)gw2--192.168.40.0/28
|
WAN
|
(b.b.b.b)pubIP--(NAT)gw3--192.168.1.0/24
i don't have access to 172.16.0.0/12 network and gw1
I was trying to set
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:41:25PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
poking around in the HP ssh docs, one can see the following in the FAQ:
Q: How is the performance of HP-UX Secure Shell?
A: Compared with conventional file transfer methods, the scp command
is 2 - 3 times slower
Andrew Daugherity wrote:
I completely missed that you're running amd64 (I saw Intel Xeon, and
thought i386). You might try an i386 kernel (maybe the bsd.rd
installer, as you don't want to mix libs between i386 and amd64) to
see if the CD-ROM works there. If it works under i386, then it looks
Can you try booting the i386 GENERIc kernel with pcibios disabled?
And like Stuart Henderson suggested, can you also try the GENERIC.MP
kernel. If that gets stuck at pcibios too, try disabling it on the mp
kernel as well.
The original poster doesn't seem to be replying, but I am having
Szechuan Death wrote:
Okay, misc: As near as I can tell (been talking with Alexey offlist),
Okay, misc, I'm a dumbass. My Russian is really remarkably rusty.
Alexey wants to prevent some benighted ISP from counting hosts behind
a NAT device; the problem is that they're wise to the trick of
Hi,
Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer to this in
the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition onto a second hard
drive?
Say I have /var on a dedicated 20ggb hard drive and it got filled up and I
need to extend all of /var (not mount additional space inside of
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:38:45PM -0500, Robert Jacobs wrote:
Hi,
Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer to this in
the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition onto a second hard
drive?
Say I have /var on a dedicated 20ggb hard drive and it got filled up
Robert Jacobs wrote:
Please pardon my ignorance, I had difficulty finding an answer
to this in the faqs/archives. How can I extend an FFS partition
onto a second hard drive?
Add a symlink.
# Han
Hello!
This is on an OpenBSD 3.7-release, freshly upgraded (in fact, reinstalled
and merged etc and so on).
If I include an alias directive in /etc/dhclient.conf, dhclient exits
after having acquired a lease, the syslog messages are like this:
Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[29778]: bound to
Hello!
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:55:47AM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
[...]
Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[29778]: bound to 82.212.35.55 -- renewal in
1800 seconds.
Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[23056]: connection closed
Oct 31 02:48:27 mamba dhclient[23056]: exiting.
When running with an
I received my 3.8 CDs on Friday, and tonight I am installing it on my
SparcStation 5.
During boot, there was a huge stream of phy not configured error
messages for a quad-hme SBus card, and install refused to continue when
it could not find any disks. I saw the lines in dmesg for sd0 and
hi,
i keep having the smmsp daemon shows on the ps aux list.
so it fills up my clientmqueue directory.
how to rid off this thing ?
i've sendmail disabled already.
thanks in advance.
-edy-
This is more a me too than a solution, I'm afraid.
On 10/31/05, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I include an alias directive in /etc/dhclient.conf, dhclient exits
after having acquired a lease, the syslog messages are like this:
This is quite similar to something I also
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 05:35:31AM +, Edy Purnomo wrote:
i keep having the smmsp daemon shows on the ps aux list.
so it fills up my clientmqueue directory.
how to rid off this thing ?
Disable the sendmail cronjob:
$ sudo crontab -l|grep sendmail
# sendmail clientmqueue runner
#*/30 *
36 matches
Mail list logo
