Any word on the degraded performance of fork operations inside the
vmware server guest? Or am I imagining that thread of e-mails?
~BAS
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 10:04 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 10:44 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
There's the answer to your question: For your
On 7/6/07, Srebrenko Sehic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both work just fine. I myself, always run SCSI via mpi(4). Works like
a charm and performs quite well.
I confirm. I have several OpenBSD 4.1 VM in VMWare 6. Some use IDE,
some SCSI. No difference from what I can tell.
Todd Pytel wrote:
...If it
matters, this is going to be lightweight, home server kind of stuff.
There's the answer to your question: For your app, it just won't matter.
You've spent more time asking, and others (including myself) have spent
more time answering your question than you will ever
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 10:44 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
There's the answer to your question: For your app, it just won't matter.
You've spent more time asking, and others (including myself) have spent
more time answering your question than you will ever personally benefit
(i.e., more work done
I'm going to be running a few OpenBSD virtual machines and was wondering
whether there was any performance difference between using IDE or SCSI
virtual disks. From what I can tell, the SCSI option has been supported
longer, though IDE has also been stable for a while now. But I haven't
seen any
On 7/6/07, Todd Pytel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to be running a few OpenBSD virtual machines and was wondering
whether there was any performance difference between using IDE or SCSI
virtual disks. From what I can tell, the SCSI option has been supported
longer, though IDE has also been
6 matches
Mail list logo
