Hi,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:30:26AM -0500, Michael Mitton wrote:
> Is there a way to supply more than one host in "relay via" similar to
> having multiple priority based MX records? I am trying to replicate the
> follow hosts for google apps domains (
> https://support.google.com/a/answer/1741
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:21:18PM +0100, J?r?me Le Gal wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> In love with OpenSMTPd since a few days I have a question about relaying :
> is there a way to tell OpenSMTPd to fallback to `smtp? when relaying to a
> MTA with `smtp+tls? fails?
>
> A little more information:
> I se
Am 06.01.2014 15:33, schrieb Gilles Chehade:
The snapshot I published has the fix for your issue;-)
Thanks, works like a charm!
Kind regards
Thomas
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
Hi there!
I tried installing OpenSMTPd in a jail on my FreeBSD server. I had
OpenSMTPd running in an other jail some time ago without problems.
I installed it using the ports-system. But when I try to start smtpd it
stops with an error.
Here the output of "smtpd -dv":
---
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Hi there!
>
Hi!
> I tried installing OpenSMTPd in a jail on my FreeBSD server. I had
> OpenSMTPd running in an other jail some time ago without problems.
>
> I installed it using the ports-system. But when I try to start smtpd
Am Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:27:13 +0100
schrieb Gilles Chehade :
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Care to share your ifconfig output ?
This is the ifconfig output from within the jail. The host holds
five IPs on one interface distributing them to the jails. The ja
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 08:03:35PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Am Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:27:13 +0100
> schrieb Gilles Chehade :
>
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
>
> > Care to share your ifconfig output ?
>
> This is the ifconfig output from within the ja
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 08:03:35PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Am Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:27:13 +0100
> schrieb Gilles Chehade :
>
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:19:10PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
>
> > Care to share your ifconfig output ?
>
> This is the ifconfig output from within the ja
Am Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:14:31 +0100
schrieb Gilles Chehade :
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 08:03:35PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Can you try to replace "listen on localhost" with "listen on
> 0.0.0.0", I suspect the ipfw0 interface is causing smtpd to fail
> listening
Hey thanks a lot! This sol
Am Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:09:53 +
schrieb James Polera :
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 08:03:35PM +0100, Martin Kropfinger wrote:
> Is security.jail.allow_raw_sockets and/or
> security.jail.sysvipc_allowed set to 0?
Yes, both are set to 0. But Using 0.0.0.0 instead of localhost in the
configfile, as
Don't you have to nat your interface (/etc/pf.conf) within the jail to be
viewed externally??
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Gilles Chehade wrote:
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:14:31 +0100
From: Gilles Chehade
To: Martin Kropfinger
Cc: misc@opensmtpd.org
Subject: Re: smtpd: socket: Protocol not suppor
Hi,
As I can read on Gilles's website[1], there is a recent feature called
table_passwd which I'm really interested to. I want to share credentials
between OpenSMTPd and Dovecot and it seems to be the perfect solution to me.
Is there any documentation about it somewhere?
Thanks guys,
Jérôme Le G
No. The IP is a external IP bound to the jail by the host. So there is no nat
needed.
Rob Sciuk schrieb:
>
>
>Don't you have to nat your interface (/etc/pf.conf) within the jail to
>be
>viewed externally??
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:14:31 +0
13 matches
Mail list logo
