Re: OS X Binaries / Patches

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 07:03:14PM -0700, Benjamin Perrault wrote: > Hi all, > Hi, > So a while back - I mailed the list ( > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.opensmtpd.general/2397 ) about OpenSMTPD > - but since I didn???t hear anything back, I went thru, sorted the issues ( > both build

Re: Support for ECDSA CA server certificates

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:00:37PM -0800, Seth wrote: > I'm in the process of switching out existing RSA Certificate Authority > server certificates for ECDSA (Elliptical Curve DSA) ones. > > Are ECDSA certs supported by OpenSMTPD? Or does that depend completely on > the chosen SSL library, i.e. O

Re: Can "pki" be omitted from the "listen on" directive

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 04:20:40AM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote: > Does the hostname in the pki directive correspond to the hostname in > /etc/mail/mailname? If so, can I omit the pki parameter in the "listen on" > directive? > > For example, if I have "mail.example.com" in /etc/mail/mailname and the

Re: Mail not bouncing on missing system user (451 Temporary failure Instead of 550 Invalid user)

An update on this thread in case anyone is interested or search for the same. I never found any resolution to let OpenSMTPD rely on getpwnam (and thus ypldap). I traced the rules and lookup further and my only suspicion is that it's ypldap causing the odd behavior with getpwnam. In the end I to

Re: Virtual domains

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:14:11 -0700, Gonzalo wrote: Mmm I have the same output.. El mar 11, 2015 11:31 PM, "Seth" escribió: Offhand I would say this is probably more of Dovecot delivery configuration issue moreso than an OpenSMTPD one. I don't have much experience using or troubleshooting

Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

I was going to build and configure dkimproxy for use with OpenSMTPD according to this guide [1] but got stopped cold by the following error: $ sudo make Fatal: /usr/local/lib/X11/app-defaults should exist and be a symlink *** Error 1 in . (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2513 '/usr/p

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

Do you try with pkg_add -vi dkimproxy ? irrc doesn't need X11 El mar 12, 2015 1:16 PM, "Seth" escribió: > I was going to build and configure dkimproxy for use with OpenSMTPD > according to this guide [1] but got stopped cold by the following error: > > $ sudo make > Fatal: /usr/local/lib/X11/app

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

On 12.03.2015 17:20, Gonzalo wrote: > Do you try with pkg_add -vi dkimproxy ? You need to install from ports tree, there are no packages for dkimproxy -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

what are you talking about?? onzalo : /usr/ports> sudo pkg_add -vi dkimproxy Password: Update candidates: quirks-2.54 -> quirks-2.54 quirks-2.54 signed on 2015-03-08T12:33:05Z dkimproxy-1.4.1p0:p5-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.06p0: ok dkimproxy-1.4.1p0:p5-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.04p5: ok dkimproxy-1.4.1p

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

On 03/12/15 17:42, Gonzalo wrote: > what are you talking about?? > > onzalo : /usr/ports> sudo pkg_add -vi dkimproxy > Password: > Update candidates: quirks-2.54 -> quirks-2.54 > quirks-2.54 signed on 2015-03-08T12:33:05Z on 5.6 there is no package: revision 1.323 dat

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

Right. El mar 12, 2015 1:47 PM, "Giovanni Bechis" escribió: > On 03/12/15 17:42, Gonzalo wrote: > > what are you talking about?? > > > > onzalo : /usr/ports> sudo pkg_add -vi dkimproxy > > Password: > > Update candidates: quirks-2.54 -> quirks-2.54 > > quirks-2.54 signed on 2015-03-08T12:33:05Z >

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

I did the following on my "X-less" installation of OpenBSD 5.6 - downloaded the two sets xetc56.tgz and xbase56.tgz - added the sets according to the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet - created the symlink as follows: /usr

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:54:52 -0700, Eric Ripa wrote: I did the following on my "X-less" installation of OpenBSD 5.6 - downloaded the two sets xetc56.tgz and xbase56.tgz - added the sets according to the FAQ http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:54:52 -0700, Eric Ripa wrote: I have not tried to remove the sets after installation however. This command will remove the installation sets $ pax -vzf xetc56.tgz | awk '{ print $9}'| sudo xargs rm -rf Obviously test it out first somewhere where it won't trash your s

Re: Virtual domains

debug: pony: rsae_bn_mod_exp smtp-in: Started TLS on session cdb6415f5a23579f: version=TLSv1/SSLv3, cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, bits=128 smtp-in: Client certificate verification succeeded on session cdb6415f5a23579f debug: smtp: SIZE in MAIL FROM command lookup: check "209.85.217.171" as NE

Re: Virtual domains

On Mar 11, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Seth wrote: > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:16 -0700, Gonzalo wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6 >> >> table dominios file:/etc/mail/dominios >> table usuarios file:/etc/dovecot/users >> table a

Re: Virtual domains

I dont want systems users El mar 12, 2015 6:43 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III" escribió: > > On Mar 11, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Seth wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:16 -0700, Gonzalo > wrote: > > > >> Hi Guys, > >> > >> I have this conf on OpenBSD 5.6 > >> > >> table dominios

Re: Virtual domains

smtpd.conf(5) for [!] domain domain virtual This rule applies to mail destined for the specified virtualdomain. This parameter supports the ‘*’ wildcard, so that a single rule for all sub-domains can be used, for example: accept for domain "*.example.com" \ virtual deliver to mbox The t

Re: Virtual domains

I mean, I don't want to create a system user per email account. El mar 12, 2015 6:55 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III" escribió: > smtpd.conf(5) > *for* [*!*] *domain* *domain* *virtual* <*users*>This rule applies to > mail destined for the specified virtual*domain*. This parameter supports > the ‘*’ wi

Re: Virtual domains

one system user will take care of it all. you could do: @domain.tld user and map all to one user. On Mar 12, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Gonzalo wrote: > I mean, I don't want to create a system user per email account. > El mar 12, 2015 6:55 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn III" > escribió: > smtpd.conf

Re: Building dkimproxy on headless OpenBSD server with no X install sets

On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:13:53 -0700, Seth wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:54:52 -0700, Eric Ripa wrote: I have not tried to remove the sets after installation however. This command will remove the installation sets $ pax -vzf xetc56.tgz | awk '{ print $9}'| sudo xargs rm -rf Obviously test

Re: Virtual domains

Ok, but now I have no email: debug: mda: all done for user ":vmail" debug: scheduler: evp:4bb1b8d779458d6b scheduled (mda) mda: new user 1f4c8dcc1b038c63 for ":vmail" debug: lka: userinfo :vmail lookup: lookup "vmail" as USERINFO in table getpwnam: -> "vmail:5001:5001:/home/vmail" debug: mda: new

Re: Virtual domains

On 03/12/15 18:37, Gonzalo wrote: Ok, but now I have no email: debug: mda: all done for user ":vmail" debug: scheduler: evp:4bb1b8d779458d6b scheduled (mda) mda: new user 1f4c8dcc1b038c63 for ":vmail" debug: lka: userinfo :vmail lookup: lookup "vmail" as USERINFO in table getpwnam: -> "vmail:5