Hello,
I was wondering with OpenSMTPD if it is possible to log the subject of the mail
in the maillog? Currently the from/to are being logged and I wanted to also log
the subject if possible.
Thank you.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, February 24, 2020 9:03 PM, Thomas Bohl
wrote:
> Fully syspatched and 'pkg_add -u'ed
> OpenBSD 6.5
> OpenSMTPD 6.5.0
> dovecot-2.3.9.2v0
I use exactly the same versions.
> I usually upgrade in a timely manner to the latest stable, but due to
> circums
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, February 14, 2020 5:48 PM, Thomas Bohl
wrote:
> I have the same problem (my logs look the same) and are very interested
> in a solution.
I was wondering which version of OpenBSD are you using? and which version of
Dovecot?
Have you found a solution
y smtpd.conf config in order
to solve this issue?
Cheers,
Mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 12, 2019 11:44 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
> Whilst I have no experience with the new OpenSMTPD, I have my 6.0.3
> working with MySQL and 2 separate query_mailaddr (recipients and
> blacklist). I solved it by simply putting the blacklist query_mailaddr
g error:
domains[19067]: warn: duplicate key query_mailaddr
domains[19067]: fatal: error parsing config file
Does anyone know how I can still achieve that? Maybe with another type of
"query_" but which one?
Best regards,
Mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 1:40 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Indeed, this somehow didn't get documented, please open an issue on our
> tracker so I take care of this when I get home in a few days.
>
> meanwhile, smtp limits are as follow:
>
> smtp limit max-mails
hieve the same limit?
Regards,
Mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, July 14, 2019 11:41 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Note that I'm PARTICULARLY thrilled about 1- and 2-, because it means we
> are now VERY VERY VERY sysadmin friendly when it comes to monitoring and
> alerting: pushing useful metrics to elasticsearch has b
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, July 5, 2019 5:25 PM, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> I'm using dovecot for imap so might as well let it handle the delivery also.
> Not much of a reason but it's it.
Same here, Dovecot "dictates" me to use LMTP...
--
You received this mail because you ar
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019 9:39 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> I think it could be possible to write a filter-spamassassin, that way smtpd
> could reject based on SpamAssassin tags.
Good idea, I might look at this alternative when I have a moment to write
somethi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, July 2, 2019 11:44 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> if you configure rspamd to flag spam mail as reject, smtpd will reject them.
Glad to hear that this is possible with rspamd! Because with SpamAssassin it is
only possible to tag the mail as spam but not
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, June 30, 2019 1:46 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> I'm currently working on bringing a filter-rspamd to life, see:
>
> https://poolp.org/posts/2019-06-30/june-2019-report-fion-bpg-and-smtpd/
Fantastic Gilles, thanks for your great work! I am looking forwar
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 8:20 PM, Damiano Venturin wrote:
> As far as I know any anti spam system just marks suspicious messages.
Yes, so basically to resume the anti-spam system (e.g. SpamAssassin) it simply
gives you a boolean answer: true (SPAM) or false (H
't want them to be tagged I just really want them to be blocked full stop.
Cheers,
Mabi
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
cial OpenBSD 6.5 errata/patches (https://www.openbsd.org/errata65.html)?
Best regards,
Mabi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, May 18, 2019 2:55 PM, David Flatz wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> Thanks for opensmtpd!
>
> I have following config (opensmtpd is compiled with --
Just to get back to all of you guys using OpenSMTPD with Dovecot on OpenBSD 6.5
who might also encounter this issue: there is indeed a workaround in Dovecot
which is to basically unset the login_trusted_networks parameter for the LMTP
protocol like this:
protocol lmtp {
login_trusted_netw
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, May 24, 2019 10:42 AM, Nick Ryan wrote:
> This doesn't really match your set up, but I have OpenBSD 6.5, dovecot
> 2.3.5.1 and opensmtpd running with the same action line and it's fine.
> No errors or issues - I'm not using dovecot proxies however. Just
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 23, 2019 12:34 PM, mabi wrote:
> I still think something is not quite right here as it works perfectly with
> OpenSMTPD 6.4.0 but not with 6.5.0.
I think I found the stinky fish here and that would be Dovecot 2.3.5 with the
following bug
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, May 23, 2019 12:14 PM, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> Make sure dovecot is running and listening at that path. Netcat should help.
Dovecot is running and I can connect to its LMTP socket file using "nc -U
/var/dovecot/lmtp" on my MX server.
> You are de
bexec/mail.lmtp -f some...@domain.tld -d /var/dovecot/lmtp
m...@mydomain.tld
Any ideas what could be going wrong here? or is it possibly a bug in 6.5?
Best regards,
Mabi
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 5:03 PM, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/functions-matching.html
>
> You will likely need to use some of the regex functions to pull out the user
> and domain from $1.
How did I not think about this wor
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 3:16 PM, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> I recently switched to dspam. It ties into smtpd very similarly to amavis
> Plus it doesn't appear to need the additional table, and
> delimeters still work out of the box. Everything you need to
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 1:53 PM, Oscar Carlsson wrote:
> As far as I know sub-addressing is enabled by default. I haven't found
> anything in my configuration that explicitly enables it, but it works
> out of the box here.
That's also what I thought by chec
s out "550 Invalid
recipient".
Cheers,
Mabi
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 31, 2018 11:56 PM, wrote:
> That seems weird. Perhaps there is something extra to configure in amavis to
> keep this from happening. Then
> again if it works it works.
Maybe, i'll check the default amavis config file if I can find an option f
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 31, 2018 9:44 PM, wrote:
> be forwarned I haven't used amavis in a few years.
No problem you got it right anyway, amavis listens on port 10024 and sends it
back to OpenSMTPD on 10025 ;)
I wasn't aware about the mailaddr table but that does e
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 31, 2018 8:29 PM, wrote:
> no worries. I'm sure its still possible. Could you post your full config with
> the listen directives.
That would be cool :) Below is my full smtpd.conf...
# PKI
pki mx.mydomain.org cert "/etc/ssl/mx.mydomain.org.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 31, 2018 7:29 PM, wrote:
> pretty sure you just need...
> action "relay_amavis" relay host smtp://127.0.0.1:10024 virtual
That would have been very nice, unfortunately the "virtual" parameter does not
seem to work with relay as I get a synta
quot;
match tag AMAVIS for domain action "lmtp_dovecot"
match tag AMAVIS for any action "relay"
match from any for domain action "relay_amavis"
match for any action "relay"
<...>
Regards,
Mabi
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 27, 2018 2:09 PM, Craig Skinner
wrote:
> Can your public MX machine route to your private IMAP machines via SMTP?
>
> Each of your IMAP servers would have an MTA on it.
>
> Make those MTAs send via LMTP to the local Dovecot over a UNIX socke
eate one action per dovecot shard, then one match per
> shard with an rcpt-to criteria pointing to a table containing the recipients
> for that shard.
>
> I’d do that in dovecot myself.
>
> Cheers,
>
> > On 26 Dec 2018, at 22:24, mabi m...@protonmail.ch wrote:
> >
h basically only allows me to deliver to one single mailbox server.
If I guess I could still use Dovecot's LMTP proxying feature for that purpose
but I think it would be much smarter to do that in OpenSMTPD directly.
Anyone know if this is possible or have an alternative idea how to do that?
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 17, 2018 1:49 PM, Matt Schwartz
wrote:
> Right off the bat, I think the mask-src might be causing a problem. I know
> that Thunderbird does some weird stuff and it doesn't play well with
> OpenSMTPD's correct implementation of smtps but you'
supported
Is Thunderbird somehow so broken that it doesn't even respect that OpenSMTPD
does not support SMTP pipelining?
I am using Thunderbird 60.3.0...
Any workarounds?
Also I was wondering if OpenSMTPD supports other authentication types
additionally to PLAIN and LOGIN?
Regards,
2018 at 1:40 PM mabi m...@protonmail.ch wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering where did the FAQ section on the opensmtpd.org website
> > disappear?
> > It had useful setup examples with LMTP and Dovecot if I remember
> > correctly...
> > Regards,
> >
Hi,
I was wondering where did the FAQ section on the opensmtpd.org website
disappear?
It had useful setup examples with LMTP and Dovecot if I remember correctly...
Regards,
Mabi
--
You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org
To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc
Hi,
I am using OpenSMTPD 6.0.2p1 as a smart host and have an issue where one mail
gets actually relayed to the recipient (the end user receives the mail) but
OpenSMTPD does not see it this way and results in a TempFail with the "Bad
response: non-printable character in reply" message. This mean
eee04bdc38046e smtp event=failed-command
command="AUTH LOGIN" result="503 5.5.1 Invalid command: Command not supported"
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fail2Ban filter for OpenSMTPD
Local Time: June 17, 2017 2:40 PM
UTC Time: June 17, 2017 12:40 PM
From: thu...@yeux
Hi there,
Does anyone have a fail2ban filter for OpenSMTPD?
I would like to block the many many AUTH LOGIN attempts as you can see here
from the logs:
Jun 17 11:55:49 gw smtpd[594]: 7eeebcc95623efe1 smtp event=failed-command
command="AUTH LOGIN" result="503 5.5.1 Invalid command: Command not s
you have the same problem as I do you're find a connection from the outside
with a user belonging to that domain and your MTA tries to reply back that the
destination address doesn't exist
Le Mercredi 24 mai 2017 3h01, Edgar Pettijohn a écrit
:
On 05/23/17 13:03, mabi wrote:
Hello,
My OpenSMTPd 6.0.2p1 mail gateway is somehow looping indefinitely with the
following log output every 2 seconds:
May 23 20:00:44 mgw smtpd[28997]: smtp-out: Enabling route [] <->
163.114.21.130 (mtagated.edf.fr)
May 23 20:00:44 mgw smtpd[28997]: c806af9e5fc46153 mta event=connecting
add
My bad I had the PKG_PATH env var pointing to 5.9 in my .profile.
Thanks for the great 6.1 release!
Original Message
Subject: pkg_add thinks I am still on 5.9
Local Time: April 30, 2017 12:00 AM
UTC Time: April 29, 2017 10:00 PM
From: m...@protonmail.ch
To: misc@opensmtpd.org
Hi,
I just upgraded my firewall from OpenBSD 6.0 to 6.1 and somehow my
installations seems to think that I am still running OpenBSD 5.9 as you can see
in the example below:
$ doas pkg_add net-snmp
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/5.9/packages/amd64/net-snmp-5.7.3p6.tgz:
unsigned package
?
and are there any replacements? so that I can manually patch filter-clamav.c?
Best regards,
Mabi
Hello,
Did anyone already succesfully integrate rspamd with OpenSMTPD ? I would be
interested to know if both products work nicely together and if anyone has any
example of working config.
Regards
M.
46 matches
Mail list logo
