> Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
> To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
> Date: Thursday, May 6, 2010, 1:41 PM
>
> On May 6, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy D. Young wrote:
>
> > suggest, based upon what you have written below,
> that ever
On May 6, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Jenny Thrasher wrote:
The Missourians for Animal Care Coalition is who is backing HJR 86.
MACC consists of :
Jenny, many of these groups supported NAIS! We dropped our membership
in the MO Farm Bureau because they were no longer responsive to small
growers o
On May 6, 2010, at 10:02 AM, CathyM wrote:
Yes, I agree, I wish that the bill could be put on line and be made
transparent,
but then it would not get through until next session and that allows
HSUS to
come into our state. So the real question is: Do you want to keep
HSUS out and
Ah, b
[mailto:missourilibertycoalit...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Vought
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 3:13 AM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
On May 5, 2010, at 11:09 PM, CathyM wrote:
> So, the debate about what HJR8
On May 6, 2010, at 1:07 AM, Jeremy D. Young wrote:
suggest, based upon what you have written below, that everyone on
this
list pressure the Missouri Senate to NOT allow a vote on this
legislation until its final form has been published online for 7 days.
Then, when we have all had a chance t
h Terriers
www.pictothehighlands.com
From: Eric Vought
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 4:03:27 AM
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
On May 4, 2010, at 6:49 AM, CathyM wrote:
> Who do you th
urilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:missourilibertycoalit...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Tom Martz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:10 PM
> *To:* missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
>
>
>
> at th
On May 5, 2010, at 9:07 AM, CathyM wrote:
I have raised animals all of my life. I want the ability to raise
animals
either commercially or privately based on my knowledge not yours and
not HSUS.
This legislation lets us do this.
No, it does not do anything of the kind.
SHOW ME THE TEXT
On May 5, 2010, at 11:09 PM, CathyM wrote:
So, the debate about what HJR86 reads like is mute at this time
because we don’t have access to the current rewrite.
So, you have been arguing that I should support a bill which I have
not read, which you have not read, which amends the Missour
alition@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 2:38:20 AM
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
On May 4, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Jenny Thrasher wrote:
> Actually, Eric did not explain it eloquently at all- he was guessing about
> this topic based on previous experience
PM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
at this point I must ask if you guys are talking about the same freaking bill I
just read, Eric you make some valid points and jenny and cathy on a dog breeders
perspective there are parts I ag
ain, and the Breadbasket of the World could very well
>> become empty. I am dead serious, folks.
>>
>>
>> Jenny Thrasher
>> Pict O'the Highlands Scottish Terriers
>> www.pictothehighlands.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:*
s.
>
>
> Jenny Thrasher
> Pict O'the Highlands Scottish Terriers
> www.pictothehighlands.com
>
>
> --
> *From:* Tom Martz
> *To:* missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Tue, May 4, 2010 3:06:43 PM
> *Subject:* Re
On May 4, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Jenny Thrasher wrote:
Nevermind. I thought you guys were interested in protecting the
rights of the little guy from the Nanny State, and all it would
impose. Do you want more Government, or less? Here they are,
offering you a permanent addition to the Missouri
On May 4, 2010, at 6:49 AM, CathyM wrote:
Who do you think is really backing this? Small farm businesses and
that
includes family farms.
BTW: I should emphasize that HJR 86 contains NONE of the language
actually submitted by small farming advocates I am involved with and
does contain
5 AM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
On May 4, 2010, at 6:49 AM, CathyM wrote:
> Now let's take this to the next level of animal agriculture - can
> you show me
> the GASP that states that chickens t
On May 4, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Jenny Thrasher wrote:
Actually, Eric did not explain it eloquently at all- he was guessing
about this topic based on previous experience in other areas because
most of what he said didn't apply here. HJR 86 is about protecting
our rights to raise livestock in a
s.com
From: Tom Martz
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, May 4, 2010 3:06:43 PM
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
Well this is why we can carry on civil discourse so everyone can be better
informed of what is occuring. There are
coalition@googlegroups.com
[mailto:missourilibertycoalit...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Martz
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:07 PM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
Well this is why we can carry on civil discourse so everyone can
On May 4, 2010, at 6:49 AM, CathyM wrote:
Now let's take this to the next level of animal agriculture - can
you show me
the GASP that states that chickens that are raised free range in a
large
business will produce the same amount of eggs as those chickens kept
in cages?
NO But I sure can
us down.
>
>
> Jenny Thrasher
> Pict O'the Highlands Scottish Terriers
> www.pictothehighlands.com
>
>
> ----------
> *From:* D L Wells
> *To:* missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
> *Sent:* Tue, May 4, 2010 7:02:51 AM
> *Su
ps.com
Sent: Tue, May 4, 2010 7:02:51 AM
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
I'm with Eric. Less regulation & more protection of rights (with a side order
of legal ramifications for breaking that protection) is what I'd rather see.
Thanks for explainin
I'm with Eric. Less regulation & more protection of rights (with a side
order of legal ramifications for breaking that protection) is what I'd
rather see.
Thanks for explaining it so eloquently, Eric.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Eric Vought wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2010, at 8:27 PM, CathyM w
Message-
From: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
[mailto:missourilibertycoalit...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Blevins
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 5:53 AM
To: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
Eric:
: missourilibertycoalition@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MoLiCo] Missouri - Alert! Immediate Action Needed!!
On May 3, 2010, at 8:27 PM, CathyM wrote:
> We need all concerned Missouri residents to contact their state
> senators ASAP in support of HJR86. If you don't know who your state
>
On May 3, 2010, at 8:27 PM, CathyM wrote:
We need all concerned Missouri residents to contact their state
senators ASAP in support of HJR86. If you don’t know who your state
senator is, go to:http://www.senate.mo.gov/LLookup/Leg_Lookup.aspx
If you don’t live in Missouri but know someone t
We need all concerned Missouri residents to contact their state senators ASAP in
support of HJR86. If you don't know who your state senator is, go to:
http://www.senate.mo.gov/LLookup/Leg_Lookup.aspx
If you don't live in Missouri but know someone that does, please pass this on to
them whether
27 matches
Mail list logo
