Re: [Mixxx-devel] recommend QT_NO_GLIB ?

2016-10-25 Thread William Good
I can't speak to the details of ScopedTimer but at these timings I'd be concerned about clock granularity and accuracy. Might be worth doing a few thousand of them and measuring the time it takes to do that. On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Schürmann wrote: > Hi > > I was exited to see if

Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects

2013-05-13 Thread William Good
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Owen Williams wrote: > And apparently our version numbers are too low?? That's a weird > complaint. > Meh, it seems that's always an issue people have with OSS. The authors have some sort of vision for the next "major" release, and everyone else just expects ever

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Compression Implementation Proposal

2012-07-22 Thread William Good
I don't foresee any problems with this, should be fine (and const-vs-non-const stuff is all just compiler-level anyway so you'll know when stuff breaks). On 7/21/12, Matthew Mikolay wrote: >>Hm, I just took a look at SoundManager again > >>and it looks like it doesn't currently send >>onOutputCon

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Compression Implementation Proposal

2012-07-19 Thread William Good
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Owen Williams wrote: > As the number of inputs and outputs increases, and as we re-add effects > to the pipeline, is our audio backend going to be flexible enough? How > many individual use cases do we need to support before we decide we have > to write some sort

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Compression Implementation Proposal

2012-07-18 Thread William Good
Whoops... On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, William Good wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Matthew Mikolay wrote: >> > > Hi all, > > Ideally, I'd like to try to further encapsulate EngineMaster and > SoundManager, not tie them more together (that was part

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Introduction

2012-07-17 Thread William Good
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Ferran Pujol Camins wrote: > So to start the engines running, I'd would like to know what > development tools or environment do you use to develop Mixxx and why > (if there is a specific reason). > Furthermore, any other help or suggestion will be welcome as well.

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: m4a support

2012-06-08 Thread William Good
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:22 PM, RJ Ryan wrote: > Yep -- IANAL but distributing code that is covered by the AAC patents (even > if it's dynamically loaded at runtime we still have to distribute a libfaad > binary with Mixxx) without a license is not ok. Indeed, I was thinking from a Linux perspect

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: m4a support

2012-06-07 Thread William Good
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:58 PM, RJ Ryan wrote: > If the user is building for themselves then this is a good idea and would > probably prevent a ton of pain for when the library is mismatched with the > system version of libmp4v2. > > We can't do this for official Mixxx builds because we don't have

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: m4a support

2012-06-07 Thread William Good
> So why not link soundsourcem4a always to Mixxx and try to load libfaad at > runtime? We could do this, but it's a huge boilerplate PITA to load all the symbols at runtime. It's probably nice in the long run, though. Probably worth a bug, this is something I can see myself doing on a particularl

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fix List Reply to List not Sender

2012-06-01 Thread William Good
Is it possible to set the reply-to address to mixxx-de...@lists.sf.net? On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:33 PM, keithsalisb...@gmail.com wrote: > Someone on the OpenSeaMap list just mentioned the problem that "reply" > always goes to the sender, not to the list! > >> > Apparently this typically is a misb

Re: [Mixxx-devel] HID blacklist

2012-05-02 Thread William Good
Considering the number of requests we get for "can I use my trackpad for $x" (where $x tends to be scratching but who knows what else) I'd say no. On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Albert Santoni wrote: > Do we ... uhh... need one? > > See screenshot... > > -- > Albert Santoni > Developer, Mixxx >

Re: [Mixxx-devel] libaudiodecoder

2012-04-17 Thread William Good
A Linux implementation would probably require writing against specific libraries (and specific versions for moving targets like faad) as the systems equivalent to Media Foundation and CoreAudio (gst, phonon) aren't really up to the task last I checked. Porting FLAC and sndfile stuff wouldn't be ter

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Mixxx online Doxygen

2012-03-28 Thread William Good
We have a Jenkins server at http://builds.mixxx.org/jenkins/ . For what it's worth I find the Doxy output for Mixxx to be relatively unhelpful but that may change as commenting improves. Bill On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Maxime Bochon wrote: > Ok, I'll do that ! > > Maxime > > PS: By the w

Re: [Mixxx-devel] GSoC Project

2012-03-23 Thread William Good
PortAudio provides a function giving the CPU time being used by the audio callback: http://portaudio.com/docs/v19-doxydocs/portaudio_8h.html#a83b8c624464dd7bb6a01b06ab596c115 Granted this doesn't give Mixxx's full CPU usage but since the callback is the only thing with strict deadlines (everything

Re: [Mixxx-devel] [GSoC 2012]

2012-03-18 Thread William Good
Hi Gayan, If you're familiar to DJ software in general, this feature is available in Traktor (not sure of the name there though, but roughly the same). > If you've used Mixxx, then you know that our SYNC button is only a one-time > sync. All it does is match up the beats of the tracks that are b

Re: [Mixxx-devel] What IDE do you use to work on mixxx

2011-06-22 Thread William Good
Hi Justus, Qt Creator is a popular C++/Qt IDE, and it's available for OSX. I don't have a Mac, but on Linux I just use vim and keep a Chromium window open for the Qt docs (this is just what I'm used to, if I wasn't I'd probably use Creator). I use MSVS2010 on Windows and it works well enough once

Re: [Mixxx-devel] SoundSourceCoreAudio for OS X (features_coreaudio)

2010-12-15 Thread William Good
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Albert Santoni wrote: > Anyways, I did some more digging and the API of choice on Windows > these days is the Source Reader API in Microsoft Media Foundation. > It's only for Vista+, but it looks significantly easier to use than > any of the other five Microsoft AP

Re: [Mixxx-devel] SoundSourceCoreAudio for OS X (features_coreaudio)

2010-12-13 Thread William Good
(Just realized I had an answer for another post, sorry for listspam :( ) Tobias, There's been talk (mostly from me) of a DirectShow decoder, given the framework's pervasiveness on Windows (and adding all the codecs in the world is as easy as downloading ffdshow) but if that ever reaches the top of

Re: [Mixxx-devel] SoundSourceCoreAudio for OS X (features_coreaudio)

2010-12-13 Thread William Good
Adam, Last I looked (summer?), support for it was at various levels of incompleteness depending on the backend used (xine, gst, ...). It worked well enough with the xine backend but it only wrote samples in real-time (~1 second's samples every one second) and the lead phonon guy in freenode/#phonon

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Fwd: [LAA] Mixxx 1.9.0 beta1 and Mixxx 1.8.2 released

2010-12-10 Thread William Good
Any ideas why he went from not being able to use ALSA well to being able to? Doubt it was anything I did and AFAIK there weren't many other changes to the sound routing stuff. Cool feedback though :) Bill On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:42 PM, RJ Ryan wrote: > Kind words in response to my linux-audio-