Thanks for documenting, gonna try it.
Noticed that the links to the LP bug report page in the commit message
disappears on github, something i found very practical until.
Interested to see your sync script.
The bad part at /commits/master is currently when someone watches with a stern
look if yo
I'm not too worried about proprietary hosting. Even if we wanted to we
couldn't "fork" our launchpad site since the data is locked in to
Canonical's servers. If the code itself is hosted in a free-software VCS
then I think that is good enough. It would be great if git had built-in
support for issue
OK so you don't want to use proprietary hosting, then how about Gerrit
or GitLab?
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente
wrote:
> An issue with Github is: it's not free software. Seems a bit odd a
> project that lets me DJ without propietary software makes developers use
> pr
An issue with Github is: it's not free software. Seems a bit odd a
project that lets me DJ without propietary software makes developers use
proprietary software.
JP
On 31/12/12 03:34, Philip Whelan wrote:
> I agree, we should do a poll. I'll be glad to participate so we can
> just get the bal
I agree, we should do a poll. I'll be glad to participate so we can just
get the ball rolling finally.
To elaborate my position (also to offer some more choices for the poll),
If I were the benevolent dictator of Mixxx (which I'm not, thankfully for
all) I'd dictate the use of github as the ma
How about we set up a surveymonkey or google docs poll and ask all the
~mixxxdevelopers what they'd like to do? Questions can include:
VCS: stick with bzr/launchpad, use github, use gitorious, writein
bug tracking: launchpad, other?
other project management: launchpad, something else, whatever, e
Here's an interesting article from one of the Bazaar devs on the decline of
the project:
http://stationary-traveller.eu/pages/bzr-a-retrospective.html
I wonder how long it will be before we see a decline in Launchpad as well,
or maybe it's already happening which is why it hasn't changed much in t
gitg is a slightly prettier version done with gtk as well. :)
--
@nathandotz
github.com/sleepynate | www.sleepynate.com
On Monday, December 17, 2012 at 5:15 PM, RJ Ryan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Schürmann (mailto:dasch...@mixxx.org)> wrote:
> > Cool
Thank you RJ for your answers.
One point I am still worrying:
If we move with lp:mixxx to git and also with
e.g.:lp:~mixxxdevelopers/mixxx/quit_being_a_jerk
It the possible to merge from the new "mixxx" to the new
"quit_being_a_jerk" branch?
If not we will have a long period where we have to mirro
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
> Cool, point-and-click native app for Github! But not for Linux :-(
> Which one would you recommend for Linux?
>
gitk is a GTK graphical history viewer and there is git gui which lets you
do git stuff via a GUI. They're both not the most p
Cool, point-and-click native app for Github! But not for Linux :-(
Which one would you recommend for Linux?
How compatible are git and bzr in terms of loosing history.
We have currently 97 branches listed in Launchpad. Will it be possible
to merge theme with a git master some commits ahead?
Or it
A reminder that launchpad wasn't open source for almost 2 years after Mixxx
started using it. Hell, Stallman built GCC on VAX and Sun because there weren't
any free operating systems that did what he wanted yet.
:^)
--
@nathandotz
github.com/sleepynate | www.sleepynate.com
On Monday, Decem
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:47:30 -0500
nathan dotz wrote:
> the maturity of services github provides is well worth the divergence
> from a 100% open-source workflow.
...
> github.com/sleepynate | www.sleepynate.com
Just wanted to put those two things closer together :^)
The maturity of Traktor,
Remember too, that Github has a point-and-click native app for mac and windows,
if anyone is worried about a learning curve on git :P
--
@nathandotz
github.com/sleepynate | www.sleepynate.com
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Monday, December 17, 2012 at 12:46
I don't have too much experience with git. But my experience with bzr
was all negative. The learning curve was very steep. I always got the
feeling that you needed to understand a great deal of the internal
workings in order to understand what command you should run.
When we swtiched it was my fir
Hi RJ, Hi All
"bzr vs. git" if you ask Google you find a lot of pros and cons for both.
I personal like the IMO easy "commit / update" scheme from SVN. Every time
I use git it is hard for me to understand what will happen.
But I am willing to learn. :-)
I think you listed pros and cons are valid
I personally like github a lot. I think the following "cons" are also
unfounded:
> > Git is harder to use than Bazaar. Developers not familiar will have to
> > learn.
> > Issue tracker is fledgling. We should only use GitHub for code and code
> > review, not for issues or wiki.
>
Although
One more benefit is we could use it as a time to get rid of the mixxx/
directory in the root of our tree since everyone has to re-checkout the
tree anyway.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:46 PM, RJ Ryan wrote:
> Here's a thought. What if we moved our repos to git and hosted on GitHub?
> We would use
2012/12/16 Neale Pickett
> +1 I'm a fan of git; bzr confuses me.
>
> Consider gitorious instead of GitHub, though. Gitorious releases 100%
> of the source code used to run the site, and is very FOSS oriented,
> while GitHub uses proprietary software and is interested in you paying
> money for p
+1 I'm a fan of git; bzr confuses me.
Consider gitorious instead of GitHub, though. Gitorious releases 100%
of the source code used to run the site, and is very FOSS oriented,
while GitHub uses proprietary software and is interested in you paying
money for project hosting.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012
Hi RJ,
I agree with your assessment and it aligns with my own experience with git
and GitHub.
In general, I'm sold on git, but I'm not quite sold on GitHub. I don't
think GitHub makes a very good "development hub" for large open source
projects since project management features are non-existent.
21 matches
Mail list logo
