[Mjpeg-users] problem compiling mjpegtool on suse (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Gernot Ziegler
Hej Brice ! Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think there is a new release 1.6.3-RC3 on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5776 that you might want to take a look at .. I also crossposted to the mjpeg-users mailing list, maybe someone here can provide you with more info reg

[Mjpeg-users] Re: problem compiling mjpegtool on suse (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Gernot Ziegler
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:03:39 +0200 From: Brice DUTHEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gernot Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: problem compiling mjpegtool on suse (fwd) Gernot Ziegler wrote: > Hej Brice ! > > Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think t

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: problem compiling mjpegtool on suse (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Gernot Ziegler wrote: > > Sorry I can't help you directly, but I think there is a new release > > 1.6.3-RC3 on > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5776 > Anyway during that time, i guessed it was gcc4 that was too strict > so i reverted to branch 3.x, and

[Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Howdy - It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) Cheers, Steven Schultz --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conferen

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. > > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) I was thinking the same thing... :). Prolly this weekend (assuming homework doesn't kill me; darn, I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:33 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. > > > > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) > > I was thinking the same thing... :

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:20 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: > - Fedora 4 > - gcc-4.0.1 > - transcode-1.0 > - reasonable settings for DV-to-DVD conversion Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2 streams generated with mpeg2enc

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: Where have you been for the last several months? ;) > - Fedora 4 Already done. > - gcc-4.0.1 Done - on Intel/AMD/PPC > - transcode-1.0 Unknown - but feel free to do that a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:39 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: > > Where have you been for the last several months? ;) Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with mjpegtools is some

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2 > streams generated with mpeg2enc and some DVD players that follow the DVD > standard specifications very literally (e.g. JVC XV-N55) - during some There are several other li

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with > mjpegtools is something I enjoy but that doesn't put any bread on my table. We all have day jobs ;) I just made mjpegtools the millionth+1 thing that must be done is

[Mjpeg-users] Re: Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Jonathan Woithe
Florin Andrei wrote: > Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2 > streams generated with mpeg2enc and some DVD players that follow the DVD > standard specifications very literally (e.g. JVC XV-N55) - during some > scenes when there's a lot of motion, the image stutter

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi - On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > times of high motion. ffmpeg's DV codec is better (in that the effect is > much reduced) but there are still issues. The visibility of the problem does > depend on the DVD player used: on some it's bearly visible, on others it's > painfully obvi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi - Fingers ahead of the brain (too much multi-tasking ;)) On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > -rw-r--r-- 1 sms sms 153813254078 Sep 6 01:26 lald.mov > > 8bit 4:2:2 uncompressed (the original 10bit 4:2:2 file is about 25% missing word - should have been "

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:51 +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > Steven has already raised a number of possible causes, but there is another > one. The material which exhibits this problem - any chance it was a DV > encoded file (a Quicktime/DV file perhaps) itself encoded using libdv or > ffmpeg? No

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:56 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > There are several other likely candidates for where the problem lies. > Sure mpeg2enc could have an issue - BUT if mplex says the .m2v is > OK, and if DVD Studio Pro says the file is OK and if it plays in > all but one player - the th

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Well, it could be a brief bitrate spike or something like that. mplex > would not complain, yet the stream would be non-compliant. Sure it would complain - at the _least_ you'd see the numbers in the Average/Peak summary at the end. If