Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise

2010-11-14 Thread Herve Flores
Le 14 nov. 2010 à 21:04, E Chalaron a écrit : Hello Bernhard Thanks for the reply. That is a normal behaviour both programms use only one CPU/Core and are not multithreaded. Ok so if I understand properly does it mean that y4munsharp will get 1 core and the yuvdenoise the oher one ?

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise

2010-11-14 Thread Mark Heath
The simple solution to worrying about the need to optimise the code for your cpu is to look at the output from top. (I am actually interested in seeing the %CPU each of your processes take up.) Are both your CPUs fully loaded? Yes - multi threading is not needed but you could always

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise

2010-11-14 Thread E Chalaron
Thanks Mark No - The heaviest hitting process is causing the bottle neck. Look at optimising this process to better utilise your machine, multithreading may help. There is no point optimising the low %CPU processes if this is the case. This is the case. It seems to be yuvdenoise

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise

2010-11-14 Thread E Chalaron
Are both your CPU cores loaded? Well one is 20 % the other 65 % (or so) and then swap from time to time. cheers E -- Centralized Desktop Delivery: Dell and VMware Reference Architecture Simplifying enterprise