Thank you very much! This helps a lot. I think I am ready to render now.
Jon
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Matto Marjanovic wrote:
>
> >I think I've figured it out, but if someone could verify my results, that
> >would be great. I think I need to design at 1365x768. Using the
> >information from t
(Footnote: If the "just render 1:1" theory holds, then don't forget
sms's comment that the frame size needs to be a multiple
of 16 for MPEG encodding--- i.e. 1360x768.)
(-matt m.)
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> For an example of the screens I'm looking at, see
>
> http://www.geodatasys.com/tv.htm
>
> Almost all of the TVs are 16:9, but some of them have native resolutions
> os of 1024x768 as well.
Oh, just normal plasma TVs. Ones that you could
>I think I've figured it out, but if someone could verify my results, that
>would be great. I think I need to design at 1365x768. Using the
>information from the VCD stills page and other pages I found, I built a
>little aspect ratio converter that, given the number of pixels high and
>wide
For an example of the screens I'm looking at, see
http://www.geodatasys.com/tv.htm
Almost all of the TVs are 16:9, but some of them have native resolutions
os of 1024x768 as well.
Jon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN's Audience Sur
>
> Aside from the number of pixels needing to be at least even (and a
> multiple of 16 - neither of criteria 1365 meets ;)) you're going to
> have a bunch of pixels hanging off the edge of the screen I think
> since 1365's a lot larger than 1024
>
I think you're misunderst
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> I think I've figured it out, but if someone could verify my results, that
> would be great. I think I need to design at 1365x768. Using the
> information from the VCD stills page and other pages I found, I built a
> little aspect ratio converter th
I think I've figured it out, but if someone could verify my results, that
would be great. I think I need to design at 1365x768. Using the
information from the VCD stills page and other pages I found, I built a
little aspect ratio converter that, given the number of pixels high and
wide the destin
> You have to use very likely the --no-constraints option. Else mpeg2enc
> does not encode at a higher resolution than 720x576, and only up to
> bitrates of 10MBit.
Yeah, I've got that part down. It's just a matter of what size the video
should be pre-scaled.
> If you have to play it back with t
Hallo
> I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
> screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
> right, it seems I need to render my animation in a different resolution
> (on the PC), and then scale it to 1024x768 so that it will display right
> Hmmm, 1024x768 is 4:3 so I'm a bit confused what is meant by
> "16:9 screen ... resolution of 1024x768"
Yes, it's a really wierd system. It's a computer monitor that runs at
1024x768, but the actual screen dimensions are 16:9, meaning that the
pixel aspect ratio is really screwy, es
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
> I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
> screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
Hmmm, 1024x768 is 4:3 so I'm a bit confused what is meant by
"16:9 screen ... resolution of
I'm rendering an animation that will eventually be displayed on a 16:9
screen that has a resolution of 1024x768. In order for this to look
right, it seems I need to render my animation in a different resolution
(on the PC), and then scale it to 1024x768 so that it will display right
on a 16:9 scre
13 matches
Mail list logo
