On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> >Here it is:
> >http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/04.yuv.tgz
> >
> >
> So, I just played a little with your video-data. This is what I got at last:
>
> http://www.sfendt.de/video/test.m2v
>
> I hope
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 12:34:44PM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> >Here are the things I see:
> >- you use the CVS yuvdenoise, which I'll compile to see the difference
> >
> >
> it should be better (and perhaps making yuvmedianfilter obsolete...)
You mean using yuvdenoise CVS r
Hi Nicolas,
>Here are the things I see:
>- you use the CVS yuvdenoise, which I'll compile to see the difference
>
>
it should be better (and perhaps making yuvmedianfilter obsolete...)
>- why do you deinterlace and reinterlace? Can't yuvdenoise and
> y4mspatialfilter work on interlaced materia
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:13:15AM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> >Here it is:
> >http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/04.yuv.tgz
> >
> >
> So, I just played a little with your video-data. This is what I got at last:
>
> http://www.sfendt.de/video/test.m2v
>
> I hope
Hi Nicolas,
>Here it is:
>http://www.europephoto.com/info/montage_video/04.yuv.tgz
>
>
So, I just played a little with your video-data. This is what I got at last:
http://www.sfendt.de/video/test.m2v
I hope this is the quality you expected to get from HI8 *bg*... And this
is the commandline I
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:03:27AM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Nicolas MAUFRAIS schrieb:
>
> >Stefan, I thank you for all the information, but... how could I use an
> >"horizontal lowpass-filter"? I read all the things you wrote, and even
> >if that's probably right, I don't know how to test i
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> Well, I'm a wise "open-source only" geek encoding his family videos. I'm
> sure there are better tools on Windows or Mac OS-X. But I just don't
Then good luck - I won't bother you with any suggestions for
higher quality.
Steven Schult
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:00:51PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Steven,
> >
> > I'm now running some tests with the filters on, and the parameters you
> > suggested. The result is nice. I mean, the video isn't very blurry, and
> > the noise is redu
Nicolas MAUFRAIS schrieb:
>Stefan, I thank you for all the information, but... how could I use an
>"horizontal lowpass-filter"? I read all the things you wrote, and even
>if that's probably right, I don't know how to test it.
>
>
OK, so here comes what I would try with this material:
Since the
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> Steven,
>
> I'm now running some tests with the filters on, and the parameters you
> suggested. The result is nice. I mean, the video isn't very blurry, and
> the noise is reduced.
Super!
> You asked me why I don't use FinalCutPro? Well, probably
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:54:55PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
>
> > Huh? It's written in the manpage of mplex:
> > -V|--vbr
> > Set variable bit rate multiplexing. This is needed to multiplex
> > variable bit-rate video streams correctly.
>
>
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas MAUFRAIS wrote:
> Stefan, I thank you for all the information, but... how could I use an
> "horizontal lowpass-filter"? I read all the things you wrote, and even
> if that's probably right, I don't know how to test it.
I think I mentioned 'y4mspatialfilter' in
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:54:55PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
> > In fact, I'm archiving old Hi8 cassettes shot around 10 years ago.
>
> Using a MJPEG (is this the DC30+ that's been mentioned or have I
> confused this thread with a different one) card?
>
> > > There's something
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:03:44AM +0200, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas schrieb:
>
> > I don't apply any filter. I spent 2 evenings trying to find good
> >
> >settings to denoise the video without any success. Each time the result
> >was blur. There was far less details on the
Just in case someone might ask/wonder... I did not try to explain, why
we have (601) 720x576 or 720x480 pixels per frame (which mainly is
related to 2,25 MHz and some factor of six...) .. I just wanted to
derive the resolution a HI8-camcorder can have.
cu
Stefan
--
Gnomemeeting/Netmeeting: callt
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas schrieb:
> I don't apply any filter. I spent 2 evenings trying to find good
>
>settings to denoise the video without any success. Each time the result
>was blur. There was far less details on the pictures...
>
>
hmm,...
you could (do you use the CVS version of the denoiser
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> Huh? It's written in the manpage of mplex:
> -V|--vbr
> Set variable bit rate multiplexing. This is needed to multiplex
> variable bit-rate video streams correctly.
Right - but '-f 8' implies VBR ;)
> I don't apply any filter. I spent 2 even
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:47:15PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> It's not hurting anything (or helping ;)) but -V isn't necessary.
Huh? It's written in the manpage of mplex:
-V|--vbr
Set variable bit rate multiplexing. This is needed to multiplex
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote:
> OK. I just re-rendered the video, using 9600kbps for video and 224 for
> audio, and I still get the same result :
> mplex -f 8 -V 02.ac3 02.m2v -o 02.mpeg
It's not hurting anything (or helping ;)) but -V isn't necessary.
>INFO: [mplex] rough-guess m
OK. I just re-rendered the video, using 9600kbps for video and 224 for
audio, and I still get the same result :
mplex -f 8 -V 02.ac3 02.m2v -o 02.mpeg
INFO: [mplex] mplex version 1.8.0 (2.2.4 $Date: 2005/08/28 17:50:54 $)
INFO: [mplex] File 02.ac3 looks like an AC3 Audio stream.
INFO: [mplex] File
20 matches
Mail list logo
