[Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Howdy - It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) Cheers, Steven Schultz --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conferen

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. > > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) I was thinking the same thing... :). Prolly this weekend (assuming homework doesn't kill me; darn, I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:33 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:17 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. > > > > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) > > I was thinking the same thing... :

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:20 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote: > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: > - Fedora 4 > - gcc-4.0.1 > - transcode-1.0 > - reasonable settings for DV-to-DVD conversion Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2 streams generated with mpeg2enc

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: Where have you been for the last several months? ;) > - Fedora 4 Already done. > - gcc-4.0.1 Done - on Intel/AMD/PPC > - transcode-1.0 Unknown - but feel free to do that a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:39 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > > > FWIW, I was thinking to try out rc3 with: > > Where have you been for the last several months? ;) Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with mjpegtools is some

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Actually, I'm concerned with an issue that I've seen before with MPEG2 > streams generated with mpeg2enc and some DVD players that follow the DVD > standard specifications very literally (e.g. JVC XV-N55) - during some There are several other li

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Dividing my time between a million things I _must_ do. Playing with > mjpegtools is something I enjoy but that doesn't put any bread on my table. We all have day jobs ;) I just made mjpegtools the millionth+1 thing that must be done is

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 19:56 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > There are several other likely candidates for where the problem lies. > Sure mpeg2enc could have an issue - BUT if mplex says the .m2v is > OK, and if DVD Studio Pro says the file is OK and if it plays in > all but one player - the th

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-07 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > Well, it could be a brief bitrate spike or something like that. mplex > would not complain, yet the stream would be non-compliant. Sure it would complain - at the _least_ you'd see the numbers in the Average/Peak summary at the end. If

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-08 Thread Florin Andrei
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 23:24 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > > But some older mjpegtools versions never had this issue, even at 8500, > > No, they had the problem. I recall various postings with "8500" and > the advice was the same then as now ;) Wel

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-08 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Florin Andrei wrote: > I create DVDs for quite a while using 8500 and never had problems. The successes were never mentioned till now - all we've seen are the problem reports ;) > I guess I could start encoding at lower bitrates, but you know - my DVD > playe

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-08 Thread E.Chalaron
If I may Some players do not accept DVDs burnt from ISO images E.g. every time I had a problem : the player, especially 2 well known brands, but that is another topic :-) E With a $60 dvd player @home ... On Thursday 08 Sep 2005 18:24, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > I maintain

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-08 Thread E.Chalaron
Hu ? Dam !!! I still need to boost the bit rate -b 9300 (mute soundtrack though) to get around -q 3 Ok ... but old movies are quite grainy too... E > (-q 3 and the average still came > out around 4100Kb/s). -

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-14 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > > It's been over a week since the last commit and/or bugreport on RC3. > > > > Time to tag and create the 1.8.0 release yet? ;) > > I was thinking the same thing... :). Prolly this weekend (assuming > homework doesn't kill me; darn, I just graduated and no I do it > again...).

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-14 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > I have just noticed a problem in the tracker with RC3, maybe you (or > anybodey else) can take a look before releasing the new package: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105776&aid=1290517&group_id=5776 Are you

Linuxvideostudio Was:Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-14 Thread Michael Hanke
Am Mittwoch 14 September 2005 20.03 schrieb Steven M. Schultz: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > > > I have just noticed a problem in the tracker with RC3, maybe you (or > > anybodey else) can take a look before releasing the new package: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/

Re: Linuxvideostudio Was:Re: [Mjpeg-users] Release Time?

2005-09-15 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 08:08 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote: > One of the packages is Linuxvideostudio (part of the mjpeg-tools CVS > repository). It does not build with the new release of the tools. It seems > that nothing has been done for ages. My question: Is there a chance that this > package wi