On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:39:18PM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
>
> > attached a small jpeg (29k) showing an example of the artifact.
> > If you look to the right of the tall actor's shoulder, you can
> > see very clearly what I'm talking about, it
Hello.
I am using ripmake to produce a (non-standard) SVCD, and got
the following messages from mplex:
[...]
++ WARN: [mplex] Stream e0: data will arrive too late sent(SCR)=31639883
required(DTS)=31629942
++ WARN: [mplex] Video e0: buf= 233219 frame=008415 sector=00050094
++ WARN: [mplex] Audio
Hallo
> I am using ripmake to produce a (non-standard) SVCD, and got
> the following messages from mplex:
If nonstandart means higher bitrate than allowed you also hat to raise
tha bitrate used when multiplexing. That is wat the message means: to
low bitrate allowed for the data comming in.
> [..
Hi!
On Thursday 04 December 2003 10:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using ripmake to produce a (non-standard) SVCD, and got
Ripmake is your source of the problem: it is NOT ABLE to produce VCD/SVCD
because it passes completely STUPID and INCORRECT options to transcode.
Even if mplex run will
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:29:20PM +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote:
> Hallo
>
> > I am using ripmake to produce a (non-standard) SVCD, and got
> > the following messages from mplex:
>
> If nonstandart means higher bitrate
Exactly.
> than allowed you also hat to raise
> tha bitrate used when mu
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
> Those are the artifacts, and no, they are not in the original source
> as far as I can see by playing the .avi with glav. The original
Ah, ok - those caught my eye more than the pattern you mentioned
(took a while to detect that).
> If
Hi, all,
I just put v0.6.0 of y4mscaler on-line at http://www.mir.com/DMG/Software/
New features:
o Added the "CVD" preset.
o Enhance 'norm' detection to recognize film/field framerates.
o The sinc kernels are now called 'sinc' and are parameterized,
e.g. "sinc:8" is a sinc truncated to
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:18:36PM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
>
> > splotches less intense, but they are still there. If you want, I
> > can lavtrans out the first 30 or 60 seconds of the capture and
> > set it up
>
> I could take a look at it a
