On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:47:33PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am compiling a custom map from OSM format, what do these error messages mean:
>ava.lang.NumberFormatException: null
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:443)
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:51
This is interesting because I converted the data from a GDB file (of
survey points) and then further edited in JOSM. Node IDs are negative
because the data didn't come from the main OSM dbase.
head elkNEW_PRS92.osm
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Marko Mäke
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:14:47PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
>This is interesting because I converted the data from a GDB file (of
>survey points) and then further edited in JOSM. Node IDs are negative
>because the data didn't come from the main OSM dbase.
I can't remember if mkgmap has troubl
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:47:33PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
> I am compiling a custom map from OSM format, what do these error messages
> mean:
> ava.lang.NumberFormatException: null
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:443)
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java
Hi Jeroen,
Did you include the --process-boundary-relations switch in your mkgmap bat
file?
I believe this is needed to process multypolygons.
Markus_g
_
From: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
[mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jeroen Muri
Dear Andrew,
Thanks for this! Adding version number in style/version file works.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andrew McCarthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:47:33PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
>> I am compiling a custom map from OSM format, what do these error messages
>> me
Am 25.08.2010 11:15, schrieb Markus:
> Did you include the --process-boundary-relations switch in your mkgmap
> bat file?
>
> I believe this is needed to process multypolygons.
No, I think --process-boundary-relations is only for
relations of type boundary (or type multipolygon
with admin_level=
Hi Chris,
Are you sure? I just removed the --process-boundary-relations from my mgkmap
bat file and the multipolygons I have added to osm no longer show up in
mapsource.
Regards,
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
[mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mk
Markus (marku...@bigpond.com) wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Are you sure? I just removed the --process-boundary-relations from my mgkmap
> bat file and the multipolygons I have added to osm no longer show up in
> mapsource.
>
> Regards,
>
> Markus_g
--process-boundary-relations is definitely not neede
I think it is needed if the ways aren't tagged individually and only the
relation.
Markus_g
-Original Message-
From: mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
[mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk] On Behalf Of
char...@cferrero.net
Sent: Wednesday, 25 August 2010 8:11 PM
To: mkgmap-
Am 25.08.2010 12:11, schrieb Markus:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Are you sure?
No, not sure, simply my understanding how "--process-boundary-relations"
*should* work.
Chris
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/m
Hi!
>> set name '${name} ${ref}'
>> set name '${name} ${anothertag}'
>> name ${name}
> OK, but can you use it in one line just for one rule like
> 'amenity=postbox'?
Just saw something in the All-In-One-Style:
highway=emergency_access_point {add ref=''; add name=''; add operator=''; add
emerge
Yes, but I checked and this polygon is not on a tile edge, and with different
tags it is rendered ok.
Thank you,
J-.
Op 25 aug. 2010 om 11:15 heeft "Markus" het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
>
>
> Did you include the --process-boundary-relations switch in your mkgmap bat
> fil
Hi Jeroen,
the reason for this is simple. The multipolygon algorithm need to decide
if the mp is fully tagged or if the tags need to be taken from the mp
ways. At the moment the mp algorithm just checks if one of the tags
["boundary", "natural", "landuse", "land_area", "building", "waterway"]
A multipolygon is recognized as fully tagged if one or more special tags
are set. The patch expands this list by the tags "leisure", "military",
"man_made", "building", "place" and "tourism".
This is a result of the thread
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q3/008849.html.
Wan
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Christian H. Bruhn wrote:
>Just saw something in the All-In-One-Style:
>
>highway=emergency_access_point {add ref=''; add name=''; add operator=''; add
>emergency_telephone_code=''; name '${ref} ${name} ${operator}
>${emergency_telephone_code}'} [0x7016 r
Is there an easy way to extract the sub-files of a Gramin img file, either
by using some of the mkgmap code or another piece of software? I am
interested in delving deeper into the file format and playing around with
the unknown areas.
Albert
___
mkgmap
On 26-Aug-10 05:51, Albert Hattingh wrote:
> Is there an easy way to extract the sub-files of a Gramin img file,
> either by using some of the mkgmap code or another piece of software? I
> am interested in delving deeper into the file format and playing around
> with the unknown areas.
>
> Albert
18 matches
Mail list logo
