On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:16:26 -0600, Scott Crosby wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>> I am getting the splitter from svn, compiling and running it unter
>> Windows XP SP3 using JDK 1.6.0_25. There are 2 problems if I am using a
>> splitter version newer than r161 (try
Mapsource can`t create gmapsupp.img. At the first step of loading the
selected tiles index generation error occurs.
Error Information:
App: MapSource
At: 04.03.2011 22:20:29 (UTC)
OS: Windows XP Service Pack 3
Processor: x86, Processor Level: 6, Processors: 2, Model: 1923 Stepping: 6,
RAM: 2097151
On 04/03/11 19:02, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
>>> Build is running.
>>>
>> Ok:
>>
>> - No Crash
>> - City-Search is working fine
Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 04, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>> >>> Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
>> >>> at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
>> >>
>> >> Build is running.
>> >
>> > Ok:
>> >
>> > - No Crash
>> > - City-Search is w
Am 03.03.2011 22:56, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
>
> On 03.03.2011 22:37, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>> For lines it works perfect. But somehow polygons really get munged and
>> destructed (lots of straight line holes - that are fewer without this
>> patch).
>>
>> Could you check what is going on for poly
On Fri, Mar 04, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> >>> Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
> >>> at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
> >>
> >> Build is running.
> >
> > Ok:
> >
> > - No Crash
> > - City-Search is working fine
> > - Address-Search in
On 03/02/2011 01:37 PM, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> This is probably good news since there are not too many changes
> to stuff outside of the index itself.
>
> So could people confirm that when they see crashes they are not
> installing via mapsource, and what GPS device they are using?
My eTrex Le
Hi
>>> Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
>>> at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
>>
>> Build is running.
>
> Ok:
>
> - No Crash
> - City-Search is working fine
> - Address-Search in the limited range is working as before
>
> What's not
El 03/03/11 20:40, WanMil escribió:
> I have improved calculation of the country information. In case no
> country information is available the most used country in a tile is
> used for all elements without country tag.
>
> The patch now patches the trunk and no longer the index branch.
>
> I hav
On Fri, Mar 04, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>
> > Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
> > at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
>
> Build is running.
Ok:
- No Crash
- City-Search is working fine
- Addre
> OK, that is fairly close to the current version in areas that I expect
> might make a difference so I'm not too surprised.
>
> Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
> at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
>
>
>
>
This seems to work ok fo
Hi,
can you build a small map and you provide this map for download. I could/would
like to test this map on my oregon.
Cheers
Martin
Am 04.03.2011 um 18:45 schrieb Steve Ratcliffe :
> Hi
>
>>> I see this with --index and without --index. So yes, it looks like
>>> the index itself has nothi
On Fri, Mar 04, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
> Knowing if 1825 breaks might be a good clue, I've built a version
> at: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/9/mkgmap-index-r1825.jar
Build is running.
> Sorry, this is going to be a difficult one to solve as nothing unusual
> happens on my Legend.
No pr
Hi
>> I see this with --index and without --index. So yes, it looks like
>> the index itself has nothing to do with the problem.
>> Going back to mkgmap-r1866 solved the problem for both cases for me.
>
> If this helps: with mkgmap-r1863 from the index branch the 62s
> is already crashing.
OK, th
Am 04.03.2011 12:45, schrieb Steve Ratcliffe:
> On 04/03/11 08:28, NopMap wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm packing an update of my beginners' tool set and so I am here with my
>> ususal question: Which version of mkgamp would you recommend as reliable?
>
> We should update the wiki to 1867, just before t
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
>
> > There have now been a few reports of problems searching on some
> > devices with the latest version of mkgmap.
> >
> > It seems that it occurs when a gmapsupp.img is created directly
> > by mkgmap and sent
Well it's about 30 seconds to get the current behavior. You simply go
into the polygons file, and exchange all "]" with "command ]"
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Jeffrey Ollie schrieb am 04.03.2011 16:09:
> Whitespace-only changes should be included in a separate patch that
> does not change any functionality. That makes it easier to review
> changes.
Thanks for the clarification.
Gruss
Torsten
___
mkgmap-dev m
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
>
> What is the desired approach on the indentation when a patch has such a
> structure change like removing an if-bracketing?
Changing indentation when removing a nesting level is fine, but it
should be confined to the area where the nesti
Marko Mäkelä schrieb am 03.03.2011 22:54:
> Could you elaborate what your patch does? Does it remove the option
> add-pois-to-areas altogether? Even though an add_poi action would replace
> add-pois-to-areas, I think that we should support both forms for some time.
Sadly this patch disables the a
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:55:22PM +0200, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
>In JOSM, I hit Ctrl-L and type
>http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/397159 and so on.
I found a faster method, loading a file like this:
Then, in the relation editor, download all incomplete members.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:27:50PM +, svn commit wrote:
>Handle relations with type=boundary as multipolygons
For what it is worth, this issues quite a few multipolygon error
messages in country extracts. For Finland, I will go them through and
blacklist them in my logging.ignore one by one
On 04/03/11 08:28, NopMap wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm packing an update of my beginners' tool set and so I am here with my
> ususal question: Which version of mkgamp would you recommend as reliable?
We should update the wiki to 1867, just before the index merge as there
is still an issue on some devic
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:59:21AM +0100, Minko wrote:
>Where can I download the versions older than r1875, in the
>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/snapshots/ I see only the latest revisions.
svn co -r1874 https://svn.parabola.me.uk/svn/mkgmap/trunk mkgmap
I do not know if there are precompiled binarie
Where can I download the versions older than r1875, in the
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/snapshots/
I see only the latest revisions.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
On Fri, Mar 04, NopMap wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm packing an update of my beginners' tool set and so I am here with my
> ususal question: Which version of mkgamp would you recommend as reliable?
>
> The Wiki states 1625, which appears a little bit dated. However, from this
> list I gather that quit
I'm using r1860 of the index branch for my public map download. So
far, I've seen no crash reports both on mapsource and basecamp and my
unit. I think this is good enough for the beginner's tool version.
IMO, this is a good release to introduce beginners to the new
search/index feature.
On Fri,
Hi!
I'm packing an update of my beginners' tool set and so I am here with my
ususal question: Which version of mkgamp would you recommend as reliable?
The Wiki states 1625, which appears a little bit dated. However, from this
list I gather that quite a lot is going on at them moment so the lates
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:36:10 +0100, Michael Prinzing wrote:
>2.) File containing contour data cannot be processed
>
The problem that the splitter did not finish with only a single thread
is solved now, but the problem with the splitter crashing
29 matches
Mail list logo
