@Greg - Thanks, I'm working on it but still no luck. I reproduced your code
for primary highways, used the continue statement as you did, removed my
old arrow rules, made sure my new "arrow way" (also used 0x26 for a code)
has a transparent background but I still can't get it to work.
@Wesley -
Hi Andrzej,
sure, if you change the poly you can avoid the situation. The problem
appears most likely when a highly populated area is close to, but outside of
the poly
and a lowly populated area inside and the polygon line is a long diagonal line
at this place.
I'll see if I can improve the
Hi Gerd,
I don't yet have a solution, I just know that the current approach
is not okay.
No easy solution. I think maybe the best would be to trim border tiles
according to bounding polygon. This could be suitable for irregular
tiles too.
Other idea could be to estimate full content of a
Hi Andrzej,
I think I understand now what the problem is,
and I also think that the high resolution is making it worse.
The current algo in fact ignores node counts outside the polygon,
the higher the resolution the smaller the grid areas and the more
data outside the polygon is ignored.
I don't
Dave, I have done the same thing with 1 way arrows (linetype 0x26 for me)
I have only done this for SECONDARY, TERTIARY, RESIDENTIAL, and SERVICE
roads. Here is my 'line' code for SECONDARY roads:
highway=secondary & ( network=e-road | int_ref=* ) [0x04 resolution 19-19
continue]
I have re-read your posts and I think I am still confused about your
statement
"you can also club together POIs with different Icons to the same POI-List
entry"
Again, what is a 'POI-list entry' and how is this a benefit?
I understand about specific store BRANDS and using unique POINTS and then
Hi Gerd,
I observe the same problem using standard extract of North America
http://download.geofabrik.de/north-america-latest.osm.pbf
I have packed my batches and splitter output (densities, areas) into an
archive:
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/292/split-poly2.7z
I have used splitter
Hi Dave,
where are your other rules, below or above the highway rule?
Maybe you can post a little bit more of the style files.
If it worked before your change, why did you change it?
Do you really need to show arrows for all kind of highways?
Here is my rule, above all others and not in
Hi Greg,
here an example for supermarkets
shop=supermarket & (name~'Hofer.*' | name~'HOFER.*'){ set
mkgmap_symbol=yes}[0x3501 resolution 23 continue with_actions]
shop=supermarket & (name~'Aldi.*' | name~'ALDI.*'){ set
mkgmap_symbol=yes}[0x3501 resolution 23 continue
