On 04/05/2011 16:11, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
MarkS schrieb am 03.05.2011 22:58:
Would something like this work?
highway=motorway [0x01 road_class=4 road_speed=7 level 6 continue]
highway=motorway oneway=yes [0x10f01 level 6]
highway=motorway oneway!=yes [0x10f02 level 6]
Then style
On 03/05/2011 21:13, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
On Tue, May 03, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
Thorsten Kukuk schrieb am 03.05.2011 20:53:
But with both statements, the arrow is always drawn below the street.
Is it somehow possible to have the arrow on top of the street?
The drawing order of the lines
On 23/03/2011 10:30, Walter Wright wrote:
Hi, this is my first foray into looking at the mkgmap code so please
bear with. I'm trying to run mkgmap in an Eclipse workspace and I've
downloaded the r1899 source archive as a starting point. I'm getting a
load of errors, mostly around a number of
this page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mkgmap/dev?
On 23 March 2011 11:53, MarkS o...@redcake.co.uk
mailto:o...@redcake.co.uk wrote:
On 23/03/2011 10:30, Walter Wright wrote:
Hi, this is my first foray into looking at the mkgmap code so please
bear with. I'm trying to run
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Mapsource only uses even resolution. Only gps uses uneven. So as you did
not set 20, that might be the reason to go straight up to 22. Try with
even resolution only.
I've changed the second line to
highway=primary mcssl=40 [0x04 resolution 20]
but it doesn't
Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
On 09/09/09 11:27, MarkS wrote:
The problem is definitely in the generated img and not how mapsource
displays it. I would expect that both roads would be at resolution 22
which is probably not what you wanted but that is due to the usual
issue of the action rules
Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
The first term in a rule has to have an equals sign (or the rule
can be rearranged so that is the case).
So the following should work:
highway=* maxspeed 78 maxspeed 82 {set mcssl=50}
Sorry about the error message, it is clearly useless and I will change
I've battled trying to narrow this down for a couple of days.
I have a lines style file that contains:
highway=* maxspeed=40mph {set mcssl=40}
highway=primary mcssl=40 [0x04 resolution 19]
highway=* mcssl=40 [0x04 resolution 22]
I'm then running a stripped down (in JSOM) set of OSM data
Does anybody know why the following lines style file doesn't work for me:
maxspeed 78 maxspeed 82 {set mcssl=50}
highway=* mcssl=50 [0x03 resolution 22]
This is the whole file and I get the error:
Error in style: Error: (lines:2): Invalid rule file (expr )
Could not open style null
The
At the momment mkgmap comes with two buit in styles (default and
noname). I'm ignoring test which seems to be empty.
Are we looking to expand the number of styles included in mkgmap itself
(for example I have something that divides roads by the maxspeed tag).
If not should we setup a wiki page
Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
Mark Burton wrote:
Has anyone managed to change the background colour on an etrex vista
hcx?
My TYP works on my eTrex Legend HCx which is very similar.
I've got it to work on a Legend HCx except it I zoom a very long way out
when it reverts to yellow.
However, I
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Mark,
However, I seem to recall that when I first played around with this the
background reverted to yellow quite early on as I zoomed out. In the end
this problem went away when I reduced the number of levels in my style
file - originally I was using the default
WessexMario wrote:
With this maxspeed debate, aren't we confusing two different data items.?
maxspeed is defined as the legal speed limit, but the speed we are
discussing here is an average transit speed for routing purposes.
The 'real' maxspeed would be useful in applications like
added we could add extra
methods in the future. For example last night I added an extra option
for a new method to calculate the speed which took 90% of maxspeed,
unless it was a single track road in which case it took 60%. I could
easily try this alternative method by using maxspeed=MarkS. I
Marco Certelli wrote:
Hello,
as I said some months ago, deciding the right speed to set in the garmin map
for each way shoud be a new mkgmap function.
The function should take into consideration:
the assigned OSM highway tag
the assigned OSM maxspeed
the number of crosses per km
Clifford Nolan wrote:
I can't seem to find the right options so that I can output more than
one map within a gmapsupp.img file and have those individual maps be
selectable with the ticks on the gps itself.
For example, if I have file_A.osm and file_B.osm how can make these two
separate
Here is a possible patch for maxspeed.
Around here lots of roads have been tagged with their speed limit (which
is 60mph). However, these are unclassified roads and you are unlikely to
get above 40mph. At the moment the default behaviour of mkgmap is set
overide the style file for these roads
MarkS wrote:
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Mark,
I'll change it. The original intention was to avoid creating another
option (as I'd seen some comment about yet another option). But I'm
happy to go down that route.
Here's a revised version of the patch picking up the suggestions Mark made
Florian Lohoff wrote:
Wouldnt it make sense to make it possible to apply factors based on road
class to the maxspeed setting?
e.g unclassified - maxspeed*0.6
tertiary - maxspeed*0.8
OTOH this should all be the responsibility of the routing engine
and at the moment as i understand
Thilo Hannemann wrote:
There is a bug in the overlays handling that breaks routing. Please try
the attached patch. I don't know whether it works with the current
mkgmap, but revision 1136 should be fine.
Thanks for the confirmation that the default version of mkgmap doesn't
handle this.
I
Felix Hartmann wrote:
overlays file contains just this:
0x123: 0x23, 0x02
0x23 is a non-routable type. Try 0x03 and 0x02 for example and it should
work.
I'd hoped that 0x02 would make the way routable and that 0x23 would then
be used for extra decoration (in this case one way arrows on
Clinton Gladstone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:47 AM, maning
sambaleemmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
Any download link of mkgmap binary with the contour generation options?
I can't find r1079 in the mkgmap download site
Er... don't all the most recent binaries (after the contour
Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
On 07/30/2009 11:25 PM, MarkS wrote:
Thanks for this. I've tried it but it doesn't seem to make much
difference. A couple of routes did calculate different (in fact one was
a bit odd as it took the M4 across the Severn Bridge and then the A48 up
the side
Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
On 07/28/2009 08:04 PM, MarkS wrote:
However, if I route across multiple tiles then it always fails.
Mapsource just spends ages and then draws a straight line whilst my
garmin counts to 100% and says their was a calculation error.
It does work for me. I routed
I'm trying out maps with routing turned on. The routing seems to work
fine within a single map tile, it also works fine when I route to a
neighbouring tile.
However, if I route across multiple tiles then it always fails.
Mapsource just spends ages and then draws a straight line whilst my
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Mark,
I'm trying out maps with routing turned on. The routing seems to work
fine within a single map tile, it also works fine when I route to a
neighbouring tile.
However, if I route across multiple tiles then it always fails.
Mapsource just spends ages and then
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Mark,
Sorry forgot to add that bit. I'm using splitter on the UK extracts from
geofabrik.
OK.
The most recent trials have used r1099, but before that I was using
r1067 and r1072 all with the same results.
OK.
As I say going from one tile to an adjacent
27 matches
Mail list logo
