Marko Mäkelä writes:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:18:43PM +0200, WanMil wrote:
>>> Maybe it would be a good solution, to look at first, if one node of the
>>> polygon is tagged as building=entrance. If there is one, use this node
>>> as POI-node, else create an node in the centre of the polygon.
I guess osmpbf.jar must be renamed first to osmprotobuf.jar? ;-)
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Wanmil,
osmpbf.jar and protobuf.jar are included in your zip file, but that didnt help.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Hi Minko,
you must put the two jar files osmprotobuf.jar and protobuf.jar into the
same directory like mkgmap.jar.
WanMil
> Hi Wanmil,
>
> I still get an error parsing file...
>
> wanmil wrote:
>
> my build file contained a wrong path to the pfb jars. I got no warning
> because the build file d
Hi Wanmil,
I still get an error parsing file...
wanmil wrote:
my build file contained a wrong path to the pfb jars. I got no warning
because the build file detects automatically if the pbf jars are not
available and deactivates the pbf support.
The new file http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/3
Henning,
my build file contained a wrong path to the pfb jars. I got no warning
because the build file detects automatically if the pbf jars are not
available and deactivates the pbf support.
The new file http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/35 should work now.
WanMil
> Hi Wanmil,
> I tried to t
On 05/10/2011 00:48, WanMil wrote:
> ... and will also tell you where it is uploaded to... ;-)
> http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/34
>
> (my send button finger is too fast...)
>
> WanMil
>
Looking good to me: http://cferrero.net/maps/img/patch.html
In the second example you can see how the POI fo
Hi Wanmil,
I tried to test your uploaded version, but it seems not to work with
pbf. Is it just a compiler-thing or is this an error caused by your patch?
Henning
Error at line 1, col 1
Bad file format: 1701.osm.pbf
Error parsing file
___
mkgmap-
... and will also tell you where it is uploaded to... ;-)
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/34
(my send button finger is too fast...)
WanMil
> I have uploaded a mkgmap.jar r2045+patch for easier testing purposes.
>
> WanMil
>
>> The patch realizes the reimplementation of the add-pois-to-areas op
I have uploaded a mkgmap.jar r2045+patch for easier testing purposes.
WanMil
> The patch realizes the reimplementation of the add-pois-to-areas option
> as discussed in thread
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2011q3/012391.html
>
> Some notes:
> * Each POI created by the new Area2P
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 07:18:43PM +0200, WanMil wrote:
>> Maybe it would be a good solution, to look at first, if one node of the
>> polygon is tagged as building=entrance. If there is one, use this node
>> as POI-node, else create an node in the centre of the polygon.
>
>That would be easy to rea
> Maybe it would be a good solution, to look at first, if one node of the
> polygon is tagged as building=entrance. If there is one, use this node
> as POI-node, else create an node in the centre of the polygon.
That would be easy to realize. For mulitpolygons one could also check if
there is a p
Maybe it would be a good solution, to look at first, if one node of the
polygon is tagged as building=entrance. If there is one, use this node
as POI-node, else create an node in the centre of the polygon.
@WanMil: Do you see a more or less easy way to control the creation of
POI out of areas w
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:32:40AM +0300, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
>>Therefore, I have been tagging the main entrance with the same tags as
>>the building polygon, replacing building=yes with building=entrance.
>>Is this really tagging for renderers?
>
>I would say it is not tagging for the ren
> Therefore, I have been tagging the main entrance with the same tags as
> the building polygon, replacing building=yes with building=entrance. Is
> this really tagging for renderers?
I would say it is not tagging for the renderer but it is odd tagging
nonetheless. A building=entrance should be a
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:09:28PM +0200, WanMil wrote:
> 3. Skip areas which contains a POI with the same name
> => If you follow the rule "don't tag for renders" there should
>be an area OR a POI but not both.
I would like to keep this, if possible. For large buildings, the
location of th
The patch realizes the reimplementation of the add-pois-to-areas option
as discussed in thread
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2011q3/012391.html
Some notes:
* Each POI created by the new Area2POIHook is tagged with
mkgmap:area2poi=true
* For each multipolygon one POI is created
17 matches
Mail list logo
