Hi Charlie!
> I would say to leave it at 0x650c: there are other items in the 0x65--
> series that are not obviously made of water (e.g. sand bar), but which
> are located in or near water. 0x650c is listed as "island" by
> cGPSmapper, but falls in the "water based" category in Mapsource /
Marko Mäkelä (marko.mak...@iki.fi) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> In the german translation in the Oregon "water features" is translated
>> with "Gewässerarten", i.e. "water types". I do not know whether this is
>> the correct translation fo
Marko Mäkelä wrote:
> Can you suggest a patch to resources/garmin_feature_list.csv then? It
> describes 0x660c as follows:
>
I didn't know this file ... If it is correct then just the translation
of Garmin is wrong in the Oregon. Then an Island is a water feature. But
another point is found i
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:53:09PM +0200, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
>Hi!
>
>In the german translation in the Oregon "water features" is translated
>with "Gewässerarten", i.e. "water types". I do not know whether this is
>the correct translation for "water features" but if, island should IMHO
>be a la
Hi!
In the german translation in the Oregon "water features" is translated
with "Gewässerarten", i.e. "water types". I do not know whether this is
the correct translation for "water features" but if, island should IMHO
be a land feature not a water feature.
Dani
_
