> Edit the series file with a text editor and prefix the line that shows
> the name of that patch with # .
Thanks Roman
Since it won't be in phase with mlvm mercurial repo, I should patch it
after syncing, right ?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@open
> I think the patch after meth-lazy needs rebasing. Just comment it out in the
> series file for now.
how could I comment it ?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
2012/7/22 Rémi Forax :
> On 07/22/2012 07:25 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Hum, commited without this import ?
>
> maybe lost in the patch queue ??
I took a look at patches and there is no ConcurrentHashMap here ;(
___
mlvm-dev mailin
Hum, commited without this import ?
Le 22 juil. 2012 à 15:46, Rémi Forax a écrit :
> On 07/22/2012 11:38 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> Even using Java 8 for building MLVM, using stephen scripts or my own,
>> build failed :
>>
>>
>>
Hi to all,
Even using Java 8 for building MLVM, using stephen scripts or my own,
build failed :
# Running javac: 43 files; in
/Users/henri/Downloads/mlvm/sources/jdk/make/java/invoke
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.8.0.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java
-XX:-PrintVMOptions -XX:+UnlockDiagnosti
Thanks to all.
I'll update my build script and produce a new MLVM for OSX, in
fastdebug mode (I don't forget Rémy :)
2012/7/11 John Rose :
> On Jul 11, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> Could you provide me link or copy of your build.sh ?
>
>
> For what i
Thanks John.
Could you provide me link or copy of your build.sh ?
Cheers
2012/7/10 John Rose :
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
> What's current build process to be used ?
>
>
> It appears that JDK 8 needs to be built with a JDK 8 release. (I don&#
n/at_generated : fichier ou
r?pertoire introuvable
make[2]: *** [initial-image-jdk] Error 1
make[1]: *** [jdk-build] Error 2
make: *** [build_product_image] Error 2
What's current build process to be used ?
Thanks
2012/7/3 Henri Gomez :
> Ping on this subject, ie MLVM build for OSX
Ping on this subject, ie MLVM build for OSX (but not only) in a simpler way ?
2012/5/9 John Rose :
> On May 9, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>
>> I managed to get MLVM to build on OS X Snow Leopard with Henri's scripts.
>> Notes:
>>
>> * I get a failure like this at the end of t
>> Any date about back port/merge of OSX support in mlvm project ?
>
> What exactly do you think is missing? Does the build fail for you? John
> updated the mlvm patches a couple of days ago to the recent hotspot-comp
> repository versions which should include OS X support.
Good news.
We stil
n it here (such as coroutines).
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On 20 April 2012 00:27, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I'm wondering when OSX support will be merged in mlvm trunk.
>>
>> I'm releasing OSX packages for stock Java 8, ji
Hi to all,
I'm wondering when OSX support will be merged in mlvm trunk.
I'm releasing OSX packages for stock Java 8, jigsaw and lambda easily now but
mlvm build is still too tricky and a pain.
Any chance to get OSX code merged so OSX Java 8 early adopters could play with
Continuous packages
Hi to all,
I guess JDK 8 and Lambda gurus are around (ie: Remy).
I build JDK8 for OSX and package it in openjdk-osx-build project :
http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/files/OpenJDK-OSX-8-x64-jdk-b29-20120314.dmg
I tried a sample code from
http://aruld.info/lambda-expressions-in-java-8-adop
t; wrote:
>> Actually it is not working in the official build either. Same error.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
>> wrote:
>>> Hello friends and Henri Gomez!
>>>
>>> I have just learned that another user build
Hi to all,
When building OpenJDK 8 yesterday, I could see in hg logs :
Changes
7112478: after 7105605 JRuby bench_define_method_methods.rb fails with NPE
Summary: Fixed several EA issues with Connection Graph construction.
Reviewed-by: never, twisti (detail / hgweb)
coro: fix for stack walking d
> Awesome, thanks Lukas!
>
> Hopefully when the next openjdk-osx-build runs, it will pick up these
> changes, and we'll have a working coro impl on OS X too :)
Oops, forgot to tweet about it yesterday.
http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/files/OpenJDK-1.8-x86_64-b11-2029-release.dmg
Chee
2011/11/17 Brian Goetz :
>> My understanding is that lambdas are currently a separate hg forest
>> (to allow the lambdas team to go faster), and that the team will be
>> bringing code across from lambdas into jdk8 mainline, and then
>> rebaselining.
>>
>> So it may not be possible to build a combin
> Yeah, in general in OpenJDK we tend to create new Projects for new
> major features (like a mac port, or this one ... ;)- that allows
> the team of people working on a feature to work in splendid isolation
> until the feature is ready to get merged into a mainline release.
>
> So Lambda (& Jigsaw
> Sounds like a great idea. Go for it, provided you have time / cycles.
I saw many patches for OS/X MLVM.
What about patches for http://jdk8.java.net/lambda/ ?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/lis
> So Lambda (& Jigsaw) are in their own Projects with their own
> hg forests. Note that Mike & Maurizio synced up the lambda forest
> with JDK 8 recently:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2011-November/004128.html
> so creating such builds should be easier then before, but given
> I updated my build scripts so a regular production build is created:
>
> https://gist.github.com/gists/243072
>
> I put the following in as comments around line 200:
>
> # include the following to enable a FASTDEBUG build:
> # DEBUG_NAME=fastdebug
> # and remove the following:
> # SKIP_
I produced a DMG in release mode (built without fastdebug).
It's available here :
http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/files/OpenJDK-1.8-x86_64-b11-2010-release.dmg
Cheers
2011/11/10 Henri Gomez :
> Done the same.
>
> We'll see about build results.
>
> If
Done the same.
We'll see about build results.
If it works, I'll be able to produce packages with/without fastdebug.
Le 10 nov. 2011 à 16:09, Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> I removed DEBUG_NAME completely...so it was not set to anything.
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3
Could someone include this patch in patchsets ?
2011/11/9 Henri Gomez :
> Hi to all,
>
> I just seen a problem with OpenJDK 8 and OSX.
>
> java works when providing full path :
>
> mbp:workspace henri$
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/openjdk-1.8-x86_64/Contents/
150 in
> 4.999186s (cycle=3)
> fib with constants 23.3 (±0.0%) i/s -118 in
> 5.069851s (cycle=2)
> fib with additional calls
> 23.7 (±0.0%) i/s -120 in
> 5.059472s (cycle=2)
> fib with constants and additional calls
>
2011/11/9 Henri Gomez :
> 2011/11/9 Charles Oliver Nutter :
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> I'm wondering about make flags to pass to have fastdebug enabled or
>>> disabled.
>>>
>>> for now, I'm using :
>>
2011/11/9 Charles Oliver Nutter :
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> I'm wondering about make flags to pass to have fastdebug enabled or disabled.
>>
>> for now, I'm using :
>>
>> DEBUG_NAME=fastdebug SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BU
I'm wondering about make flags to pass to have fastdebug enabled or disabled.
for now, I'm using :
DEBUG_NAME=fastdebug SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=true
What should be arguments to have a build with fastdebug enabled or disabled ?
Thanks to all
___
mlvm-dev
Hi to all,
I just seen a problem with OpenJDK 8 and OSX.
java works when providing full path :
mbp:workspace henri$
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/openjdk-1.8-x86_64/Contents/Home/bin/java
-version
openjdk version "1.8.0-b11-fastdebug"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-b11-fastdebug-20
Hi to all,
I'm tracking hg commit in bsd-port, mac-osxport list to produce OSX packages
For DaVinci, I'm now tracking also mlvm-dev but wondering which lists
I should track also to produce up to date openjdk8 + mlvm packages for
OS/X.
Thanks for your advices
__
> From Henri
>
> So, I could disable fastdebug in build ?
>
> To charles
> Do we need the fastdebug to get the asm listing? And is it slower to
> run or just start up?
> It seems to run my benchmarks about 30% slower.
>
> Since we have Stephen's with fast debug Henri's could be what
> Not much. There are a few monitoring/debugging flags that won't work but
> they aren't anything a typical user wants to use. The installed package
> would be better as a release build.
So, I could disable fastdebug in build ?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
> # http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
> #
> Current thread is 4341268480
> Dumping core ...
> Abort trap
>
> - Charlie
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Ok, I get them and coro
Ok, I get them and coro is included in OpenJDK 8 from openjdk-osx-build
2011/11/6 Henri Gomez :
>
>
> Le 6 nov. 2011 à 22:12, Henri Gomez a écrit :
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I'm looking for Coro patch by Lukas Stadler, any body knows where I can find
>>
Hi to all,
I'm looking for Coro patch by Lukas Stadler, any body knows where I can find it
?
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
y I want to
> make sure they're running something as close to a normal release as
> possible.
>
> - Charlie
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Charles
>>
>> For OpenJDK 8 build/package for OS/X, you told me FASTDEBUG slow down
>
Charles
For OpenJDK 8 build/package for OS/X, you told me FASTDEBUG slow down
startup stuff.
Do you want me to disable it in OSX build/package ?
2011/11/5 Charles Oliver Nutter :
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Thanks.
>> Yes, OpenJDK 7 is using llvm gcc/
work on NaCl? :-)
>
> - Charlie (mobile)
> On Nov 3, 2011 4:53 AM, "Henri Gomez" wrote:
> >
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'd like to provide OpenJDK 8 with MLVM to OS/X users as I'm doing for
> > month with OpenJDK 7 on http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-
> Yes, works now for me using gcc 4.0, thanks.
>
> New build available here:
> http://www.concord.org/~sbannasch/mlvm/java-1.8.0-internal-mlvm-2011_11_04.tar.gz
>
> pass all jdk/test/java/lang/invoke tests as well as
> jdk/test/java/dyn/CoroutineTest.java
I'll try some build manually and if nothi
2011/11/4 John Rose :
> Recent changes in hsx/hotspot have destabilized the build on mac. I just
> pushed another workaround here:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/file/tip/mac-tweaks.patch
>
> The buildtree.make change fixes the failure Henri saw. (Or you can add
> "ALWAYS_PAS
I didn't get gamma built.
I see your OpenJDK is an old one.
From bsd-port ?
Are you using XCode 4 or previous ?
Le 3 nov. 2011 à 22:27, Mark Roos a écrit :
> From Henri
>
> All done.
> cd bsd_amd64_compiler2/fastdebug && ./test_gamma
> openjdk full version "1.7.0-b147-20110923"
> Error occu
> Not certain what this commit was fixing but I am still getting this error:
>
> Linking vm...
> [ -f libsaproc_g.dylib ] || { ln -s libsaproc.dylib libsaproc_g.dylib; }
> dsymutil libjvm.dylib
> warning: no debug symbols in executable (-arch x86_64)
> echo "Doing vm.make build:"
> Doing vm.make bu
Hi to all,
I'd like to provide OpenJDK 8 with MLVM to OS/X users as I'm doing for
month with OpenJDK 7 on http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/.
I'm trying to build it using Stephen scripts
(https://gist.github.com/243072) for now but I still can't get it
built :
/Users/henri/
:
Current OpenJDK 1.7 for OS/X dylib are in ${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/client,
${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib, ${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/lwawt,
${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/server and ${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/xawt
2011/10/30 Henri Gomez :
> I'm trying to build OpenJDK 8 on OS/X 10.6.8 following Stephen guide
I'm trying to build OpenJDK 8 on OS/X 10.6.8 following Stephen guide
(https://gist.github.com/243072)
I get the same error even after grabbing your latest changes :
cd bsd_amd64_compiler2/fastdebug && ./test_gamma
openjdk full version "1.7.0-b215-20111029"
Error occurred during initialization of
45 matches
Mail list logo
