On 08/14/2014 12:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there an end-user accessible way of defining anonymous classes (by
which I mean classes which are kept alive only by explicit references
or their instances, and not their class loader)?
Searching for the term anonymous classes isn't
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:39 PM, John Rose john.r.r...@oracle.com wrote:
If the host-class token were changed to a MethodHandles.Lookup object, we
could restrict the host-class to be one which the user already had
appropriate access to. Seems simple, but of course the rest of the project
On 08/16/2014 12:39 AM, John Rose wrote:
Do you have a use case in mind that could be expressed as a more tightly
focused API?
My use-case is run-time class generation and avoiding unnecessary
retention of classes which are referred to by the generated class.
I do not need constant pool
On 08/17/2014 12:55 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 08/16/2014 12:39 AM, John Rose wrote:
Do you have a use case in mind that could be expressed as a more
tightly focused API?
My use-case is run-time class generation and avoiding unnecessary
retention of classes which are referred to by the
On 08/16/2014 12:39 AM, John Rose wrote:
On Aug 15, 2014, at 5:03 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:15 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
Look into sun.Misc.Unsafe
[and at defineAnonymousClass(Class, byte[], Object[])]
Thanks. Could we turn this into a supported API, with a
On 08/14/2014 10:15 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
Look into sun.Misc.Unsafe
[and at defineAnonymousClass(Class, byte[], Object[])]
Thanks. Could we turn this into a supported API, with a suitable
security manager check?
I'm surprised there aren't any callers of this method in Fedora.
Anonymous
The Java folks will have to answer this, but I have heard that there are thoughts on how to make unsafe safe and portable. You might ask on the jigsaw list.
-Mark
On Aug 15, 2014, at 5:03 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:15 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
Look into
On Aug 15, 2014, at 5:03 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/14/2014 10:15 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
Look into sun.Misc.Unsafe
[and at defineAnonymousClass(Class, byte[], Object[])]
Thanks. Could we turn this into a supported API, with a suitable security
manager check?
Hi
Is there an end-user accessible way of defining anonymous classes (by
which I mean classes which are kept alive only by explicit references or
their instances, and not their class loader)?
Searching for the term anonymous classes isn't particularly revealing
due to the Java-level language
Is there an end-user accessible way of defining anonymous classes
(by
which I mean classes which are kept alive only by explicit
references or
their instances, and not their class loader)?
Searching for the term anonymous classes isn't particularly
revealing
10 matches
Mail list logo
