On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
> I tried switching out asType to explicitCastArguments. That ended up
> being about 5% slower.
Sorting out asType and eCA probably needs a Cookbook entry or two. I'll post
those separately.
The main differences between asType and eCA are:
- eCA t
This is an auto-replied message. I am out of the office until Aug 22nd with
limited access to email and phone.
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
On Aug 12, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On the other side of things...I hope those languages that will churn
> through method handles also realize they're unlikely to ever JIT...
Getting native code out of the MH-construction process brings them much closer
to optimizability.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> FYI, this is:
>
> 7071693: JSR 292: native method calls slow down method handle constructor
> execution
>
> I'm not sure if John is already working on that but that's the plan.
This will be very nice. I think it's going to be quite co
On Aug 10, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>>>
> The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
> H
On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
> On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>>
The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
How are you invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH
ca
On 2011-07-28 10.11, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>>> The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all.
>>> How are you invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH
>>> call?
>>
>> valueMH is combined with an exactInvoker and
On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>> The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all. How are
>> you invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH call?
>
> valueMH is combined with an exactInvoker and then chained together with
> another method handle that cal
> The bad performance sounds like something is not inlined at all. How are you
> invoking valueMH? Via invokedynamic or a direct MH call?
valueMH is combined with an exactInvoker and then chained together with
another method handle that calls a method on the result of it that
returns another me
On Jul 28, 2011, at 2:20 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've hit a very annoying performance problem with invoke dynamic/method
> handles that makes certain benchmarks about 3 times slower for identical
> operations. This code is related to to variable lookup and the basic
> idea is that I have a
10 matches
Mail list logo
