At 5:47 PM -0700 9/12/11, John Rose wrote:
>On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
>
>>> Please give it a whirl and let me know what breaks.
>>
>> I have a working build on Mac OS X Lion with gcc-4.2. I started with
>> stephenb's MLVM build scripts.
>
>Excellent work.
>
>Did you have t
> Did you have to use patches/hotspot/snowleopard.patch for gcc-4.2, or can we
> delete that?
The snowleopard.patch was applied, I'll have a go at a build without it.
>> - The really odd one was the hotspot build wasn't copying the
>> necessary files into its import folder (failed to find the ap
On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
>> Please give it a whirl and let me know what breaks.
>
> I have a working build on Mac OS X Lion with gcc-4.2. I started with
> stephenb's MLVM build scripts.
Excellent work.
Did you have to use patches/hotspot/snowleopard.patch for gcc-4.2,
> Please give it a whirl and let me know what breaks.
I have a working build on Mac OS X Lion with gcc-4.2. I started with
stephenb's MLVM build scripts. I have a couple of small issues to
crack as I went:
- Bootstrapped with 64bit bsd-port openjdk 1.7 binaries from:
http://code.google.com/p/op
> Should there be a relevant jdk7-b147-to-bsd-port.patch patch for the
> hotspot tree?
>
> (blush) Now there is. -- John
Cheers!
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Michael Barker wrote:
> Should there be a relevant jdk7-b147-to-bsd-port.patch patch for the
> hotspot tree?
(blush) Now there is. -- John___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mai
Hi,
Should there be a relevant jdk7-b147-to-bsd-port.patch patch for the
hotspot tree?
stub:hotspot mikeb01$ hg qselect
bsd-port
stub:hotspot mikeb01$ head -4 .hg/patches/series
# base = a32de5085326 in
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-comp/hotspot [2011-09-01]
jdk7-b147-to-bsd-port.patch
> is gcc 4.0 still required.
>
> That requirement hasn't changed. I don't think anyone has retried 4.2
> recently.
Does anyone know where to get binaries for gcc-4.0 on Lion? My shiny
new laptop stubbornly refuses to build 4.0 from macports.
Mike.
___
On Sep 2, 2011, at 5:07 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> is gcc 4.0 still required.
That requirement hasn't changed. I don't think anyone has retried 4.2 recently.
> I removed the bsd-port forest in sources and ran:
>
> hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-comp sources
>
> Re-create
>OK, I have rebased the mlvm patch repository to hsx/hotspot-comp.
>
>If you have been reusing your upstream source repositories (based on
>bsd-port), you will have to discard them and pull instead from hotspot-comp.
>
>As a temporary solution for building on Mac OS, I have included a set of new
At 12:58 AM -0700 9/2/11, John Rose wrote:
>OK, I have rebased the mlvm patch repository to hsx/hotspot-comp.
>
>If you have been reusing your upstream source repositories (based on
>bsd-port), you will have to discard them and pull instead from hotspot-comp.
>
>As a temporary solution for buildin
OK, I have rebased the mlvm patch repository to hsx/hotspot-comp.
If you have been reusing your upstream source repositories (based on bsd-port),
you will have to discard them and pull instead from hotspot-comp.
As a temporary solution for building on Mac OS, I have included a set of new
patche
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm open to suggestions on this one.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that the bsd-port repo. is slowing down prior to absorption
>>> into the mainline.
>>>
>>> In this case, maybe the rational thing is to reparent to a faster-moving
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm open to suggestions on this one.
>>
>> It seems to me that the bsd-port repo. is slowing down prior to absorption
>> into the mainline.
>>
>> In this case, maybe the rational thing is to reparent to a faster-moving
>> repo.
>>
>> In particular, I think we should reparent to fro
On Aug 19, 2011, at 12:58 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
>
>> I'm basing my mlvm builds on clones of the following two mercurial forests:
>>
>> hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port sources
>> hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.ne
On Aug 17, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote:
> I'm basing my mlvm builds on clones of the following two mercurial forests:
>
> hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port sources
> hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm patches
>
> Complete build scripts here: htt
This is an auto-replied message. I am out of the office until Aug 22nd with
limited access to email and phone.
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
I'm basing my mlvm builds on clones of the following two mercurial forests:
hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port sources
hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm patches
Complete build scripts here: https://gist.github.com/243072
Are there changes I should make sinc
18 matches
Mail list logo
