I was trying to describe a process in which Mnemosyne would allow you
to first be exposed to a constellation of content that is related
(e.g. the 3 characteristic verbs in Arabic, or a verb conjugated
through multiple persons in French etc) so as to build your basic
recognition of those elements as
> There are many ways around this, e.g. by adding a field specific for example
> sentences
special fields - that I take is also 2.x. In other words autoupdate is
not going to be optional :-)
today if I create an entry from a dictionary definition it makes
something like:
枪 - qiāng - gun/firearm/r
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 11:57:48 pm G. wrote:
> Insofar as memorization that involves two (or more) steps of initial
> recognition and subsequently more specified recognition: I'm imagining
> a situation where initially you introduce a set of vocab words (say 20
> new words) - some of which inc
Insofar as memorization that involves two (or more) steps of initial
recognition and subsequently more specified recognition: I'm imagining
a situation where initially you introduce a set of vocab words (say 20
new words) - some of which include conjugated or declined forms of the
same word (for sa
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 08:45:12 am normunds wrote:
> This is something I also hope will be possible in 2.0. Either solved
> with multiple categories, or otherwise.
>
> If it is possible to determine "add card event" and distinguish
> "direct" vs. "inverse" then it's easy to add this catgeory
This is something I also hope will be possible in 2.0. Either solved
with multiple categories, or otherwise.
If it is possible to determine "add card event" and distinguish
"direct" vs. "inverse" then it's easy to add this catgeory via plugin
(provided we have multiple categories).
But then again
On Wednesday, March 02, 2011 04:01:12 am G. wrote:
> > Did you know that you can select 'add vice versa too' in the 'add cards'
> > dialog to achieve this ? :-)
>
> Right! What I thought would be useful was being able to actually add
> the vice versa to a *different* category, allowing one to focu
> Did you know that you can select 'add vice versa too' in the 'add cards'
> dialog to achieve this ? :-)
Right! What I thought would be useful was being able to actually add
the vice versa to a *different* category, allowing one to focus on the
Q&A relationship separately from the A&Q relationsh
> Ps. I've had this list of features that would be useful, based on my
> own usage. I've been meaning to post them for some time & figure
> sooner is better than later: where is the proper place to post? I
> couldn't find a dedicated page . . . Here they are, in no particular
> order:
There is our
