One of the frustrations I have heard so far is that the audience there
is too small to get meaningful data around various experiments.
Currently people have to opt in by going to
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileOptions which is hidden
away in the mobile interface. They can do this
That pretty much sums it up Jon, thanks for that.
My vision is that ideally VE standalone would work in mobile on it's own,
and so the MW integration would be as light as possible: connecting up the
load/save APIs and placing the VE instance in the right place.
Converting MF to OOUI widgets is
This will be a part time activity that will happen on the side managed
via phabricator bugs. I do not anticipate this being a drastic amount
of work, especially given the prior cleanup we have done in the
MobileFrontend extension.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Maryana Pinchuk
I have setup https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T87664
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Moving to mobile-l.
The main page changes a lot so it is not the best example. Today for
example our image weight is 15.36 kB
I'm a little confused what
Have we thought about automatically opting people into beta mode e.g.
a sample of our users in a certain geographic region / certain zero
enabled area/ all users in a certain bucket based on their user id ?
I like this idea. In fact, I'm for it, provided that we make it clear to
the user
Yeah, I think there are a lot of problems with the opt-in beta model. I
much prefer releasing new features to a small % of users, logging
events/usage, and if we suspect something has the potential to be
disruptive/offputting, letting them know the feature they're seeing is beta
and letting them
Is this https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T68819 again?
As an example, I prefer
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/140527_0F_HE3/4/details/
JPG rarely get unwiedly, but it's very easy to reach multiple megabytes
with a handful PNG and GIF files. On [[w:en:Barack Obama]], the biggest
image (25
On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Jon Robson jrob...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We previously explored this
but it didn't get enough support and I think it is worth revisiting
now the MobileFrontend code is in a stronger place.
I was not part of the previous conversation, but I guess one of the
Ed Sanders, Trevor and I had an in real life conversation, last
Friday, where we spoke about the VisualEditor tablet (and future
mobile) offering. We've had a bunch of issues with it so far breaking
and a lot of this is due to two conflicting technologies.
We're keen to bring VE code and mobile
