[mochikit] Re: DOM Manipulation: Setting textNode to html string.

2006-11-01 Thread abargnesi
Zac, Thanks for the tip. I used innerHTML on the TD after I created it and it works perfectly (at least in firefox). The reason why I used Mochikit is because I would like to not use innerHTML (not standard) and also avoid performance penalties by using the DOM Api directly. Is there a way of

[mochikit] Re: DOM Manipulation: Setting textNode to html string.

2006-11-01 Thread Zachery Bir
On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:02 AM, abargnesi wrote: Zac, Thanks for the tip. I used innerHTML on the TD after I created it and it works perfectly (at least in firefox). The reason why I used Mochikit is because I would like to not use innerHTML (not standard) and also avoid performance

[mochikit] Re: DOM Manipulation: Setting textNode to html string.

2006-11-01 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 11/1/06, abargnesi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the tip. I used innerHTML on the TD after I created it and it works perfectly (at least in firefox). The reason why I used Mochikit is because I would like to not use innerHTML (not standard) and also avoid performance penalties by

[mochikit] Re: DOM Manipulation: Setting textNode to html string.

2006-11-01 Thread abargnesi
Guys, Thanks for all the information. I think, since our project will be moving in the direction of strict adherence to xhtml, that I will forgo innerHTML and construct the serialized element directly. Thanks again. Anthony Bargnesi On Nov 1, 9:51 am, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[mochikit] Re: setStyle() not in documentation?

2006-11-01 Thread Jason Bunting
On 10/30/06, Bob Ippolito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/30/06, Jason Bunting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MochiKit advertises that one of the greatest things about it is the documentation and the accuracy thereof, as well as the fact that it is current with what is currently being

[mochikit] Mochikit.Visual

2006-11-01 Thread Dave Woodwater
Hi, I'm trying out Mochikit to see if it's the right tool for the job. I can pretty much get everything I need a'working, but for some reason I keep getting errors when trying to call the visuals. I get toggle/puff/etc... not defined. I included the js in the page and I'm trying to figure out

[mochikit] Re: Mochikit.Visual

2006-11-01 Thread Matt
How 'bout giving us a peek at the code you're using? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups MochiKit group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[mochikit] Re: Mochikit.Visual

2006-11-01 Thread Zachery Bir
On Nov 1, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Dave Woodwater wrote: Hi, I'm trying out Mochikit to see if it's the right tool for the job. I can pretty much get everything I need a'working, but for some reason I keep getting errors when trying to call the visuals. I get toggle/puff/etc... not defined. I

[mochikit] Re: [object Object]

2006-11-01 Thread Bob Ippolito
On 11/1/06, Craig Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello - I'm starting to noodle around with MochiKit after having done a bit of roll-my-own Javascript coding. I'm trying to do some DOM manipulation stuff and have run into a problem that I can't get past. I'm creating a couple of spans,

[mochikit] Re: [object Object]

2006-11-01 Thread Craig Amundsen
Hi -Thanks for the fast response.That's because you're not calling the functions with the right arguments. SPAN(null, {attributes}) is not correct. The null should definitelynot be there. Was there something in the documentation that made youthink that the attributes should be second?I'm just

[mochikit] Array.push and IE5

2006-11-01 Thread Hamish Friedlander
Hi,Normally I ignore IEs older than 6 (I don't need that sort of hassle), but recently I tested some _javascript_ I had written for a client in IE5 and it failed. The culprit was Array.push, which for no clear reason IE5 doesn't support. Unfortunately, it's used quite a lot in Mochikit. I've