On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:58:28AM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> [...]
> BTW; I'm worried that we're binding the logic too much to a specific
> device with 2 interfaces; I've seen some online AT command reference
> that doesn't even talk about the third parameter to specify interface
> index i
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:04 PM, matthew stanger wrote:
> Uggg I am very sorry but that patch is not the right patch. It has none of
> the fixes I worked on :(. Very sorry and terribly embarrassed. As soon as I
> get back to my home computer I will mail out the correct one. I'd avoid
> doing any w
Uggg I am very sorry but that patch is not the right patch. It has none of
the fixes I worked on :(. Very sorry and terribly embarrassed. As soon as I
get back to my home computer I will mail out the correct one. I'd avoid
doing any work on this one for the next 24h.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 8:54 A
Alexsander,
I'm traveling right now will test as soon as I get back tomorrow.
On Nov 24, 2016 2:58 AM, "Aleksander Morgado"
wrote:
> Hey Matthew,
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Aleksander Morgado
> wrote:
> > Great work! it looks really good now, although there are some small
> > things
Hey Matthew,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Aleksander Morgado
wrote:
> Great work! it looks really good now, although there are some small
> things that could still be fixed. Let me prepare a branch with your
> patch and I'll include some additional patches for you to review.
Please check th
