Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-28 Thread Aleksander Morgado
Hey, > > I agree with Matthew. Both, the simple and non-simple interface should allow > to explicitly set the CID. Having this implemented, all these odd > configurations can be handled. > If we modified the logic to assume CID=1 as default lte attach bearer settings in selected modems, we

AW: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-28 Thread Stelling2 Carsten
: Stelling2 Carsten; ModemManager (development) Betreff: Re: [review] LTE attach config and status I don't think that CID=1 is always the one that the module expects to use as initial EPS bearer I'd agree, but so far the small set of carriers we've seen requiring specific PDP's have all been #1

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-27 Thread matthew stanger
> > I don't think that CID=1 is always the one that the > module expects to use as initial EPS bearer I'd agree, but so far the small set of carriers we've seen requiring specific PDP's have all been #1. Didn't Verizon require to use CID=4 for the same purpose in their > modems? Vzw is a

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-27 Thread Aleksander Morgado
> 4 In 4G the 1 context (where default EPS bearer is created) generally does > not require an APN, APN is required on other context to set up data sessions > instead . In any case the rules are made by network operator > Unfortunately, I don't think that CID=1 is always the one that the module

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-27 Thread Aleksander Morgado
> Having this feature would be great, because I'm facing exactly this issue > using SIM cards from the Vodafone GDSP platform in conjunction with Telit > LE910-V2 modem. > Using this kind of SIM always result in "registration denied". With the > information provided by Telit this behavior is

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-27 Thread Aleksander Morgado
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:45 PM Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 18:01 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > Hey hey, > > > > See the following MR: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/merge_requests/52 > > I merged the K/V PR so this one needs a rebase

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-26 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 18:01 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Hey hey, > > See the following MR: > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/merge_requests/52 I merged the K/V PR so this one needs a rebase now. Dan > The changes will update the 3GPP interface with: >

Re: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-26 Thread matthew stanger
This is great to have and I'm seeing more carriers this is occurring in as well (Vzw, Japan & S. Korea). To be honest, this would be a much better way to get started with modem auto configure than APN guessing games :) On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:02 AM Aleksander Morgado <

AW: [review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-26 Thread Stelling2 Carsten
TD*99...) is better is done on context different form the 1st, so it's fine as you're doing it now." Regards, Carsten -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ModemManager-devel [mailto:modemmanager-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] Im Auftrag von Aleksander Morgado Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Nove

[review] LTE attach config and status

2018-11-23 Thread Aleksander Morgado
Hey hey, See the following MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mobile-broadband/ModemManager/merge_requests/52 The changes will update the 3GPP interface with: * A new read-only property "InitialEpsBearer", which points to a Bearer object that will be automatically created and exposed in DBus