http://bulknews.net/lib/archives/Log-Dispatch-Config-0.11_02.tar.gz
0.11_02 Fri Jan 18 05:08:22 JST 2002
* [API change]
No check on config mtime by default
New class method: configure_and_watch()
(Thanks to Hiroyuki Oyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
- Modifi
Hello modperl,
Can anybody install mod_perl on cygwin ports?
--
Best regards,
úÁÑÃ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Philip Mak wrote:
> The following webpage on a mod_deflate enabled server is not working
> correctly in some browsers:
>
> http://www.aaanime.net/pmak/sylphiel/
>
> If I "telnet www.aaanime.net 80" and send the following commands:
>
> GET /pmak/sylphiel/ HTTP/1.1
> Host: w
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> Philip Mak wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:38:17PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> >
> >>Philip Mak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>The following webpage on a mod_deflate enabled server is not working
> >>>correctly in some browsers:
> >>>
> >>[OT stuff
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 12:44 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> In a Mason context, which is where I'm using it, I do this in my
>> top-level autohandler (ignore the main:: subroutines, they're just for
>> pedagogy):
>>
>>
>> <%init>
>> # 'local' so it's available to lower-level components
> In a Mason context, which is where I'm using it, I do this in my
> top-level autohandler (ignore the main:: subroutines, they're just for
> pedagogy):
>
>
> <%init>
> # 'local' so it's available to lower-level components
> local *session;
>
> my $dbh = &::get_dbh;
> my $session_id = &::g
On Friday, January 4, 2002, at 02:22 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
> For the sake of thread completion, here's a script which demonstrates
> the bug. It turns out to be a Perl bug (5.6.1, at least), not an
> Apache::Session bug. I'll post to p5p after I post here.
I was surprised to find the "it's
Hi all,
Anyone using 5.7.0 had any trouble with dprofpp?
Devel::DProf writes tmon.out OK but dprofpp doesn't understand it.
The whole kit came with 5.7.0 in one source tarball.
I searched p5p with the Google and the perl.com engine and came up
with nothing.
73,
Ged.
Philip Mak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:38:17PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>>Philip Mak wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The following webpage on a mod_deflate enabled server is not working
>>>correctly in some browsers:
>>>
>>[OT stuff snipped]
>>did you email the right list?
>>
>
> I figured that
Philip Mak wrote:
> The following webpage on a mod_deflate enabled server is not working
> correctly in some browsers:
[OT stuff snipped]
did you email the right list?
I'm not sure why mod_deflate and mod_accel problems keep popping up here
of late, but maybe there's some mis-information
The following webpage on a mod_deflate enabled server is not working
correctly in some browsers:
http://www.aaanime.net/pmak/sylphiel/
If I "telnet www.aaanime.net 80" and send the following commands:
GET /pmak/sylphiel/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.aaanime.net
Accept-Encoding: gzip
then the data it sen
At 9:06 PM + 1/16/02, Mark Maunder wrote:
>That's cool, but any ideas on how to do this with different domain names i.e.
>foo.com, bar.com, baz.com and boo.com? You can't create cookies for the .com
>domain, so there's no way to hand out auth cookies from foo.com (when the user
>logs into foo.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 12:53:17PM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 12:24, James G Smith wrote:
>
> > There is no standard method of doing single sign-on. When I
> > submitted a draft for such a beast to be put in HTTP, the main
> > concern was opening up more privacy holes
> I hadn't really taken a look at personal certificates until this thread
> came up. It looks like thawte is offering personal certificates at no
> charge.
>
> http://www.thawte.com/getinfo/products/personal/contents.html
Yep, and the society I work in develops a GPLed PKI, which is a
Perl+PH
>>Of course, the best authentication system for banking I've seen is
>>from UBS. They send you a scratchlist of around 100 numbers. Every
>>time you login you use one of the numbers and cross it off. Very
>>slick.
>
> Does that really work in practice? That sounds really annoying. Is this for
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Mark Maunder wrote:
> The only way I could come up with, was to have the browser redirected
> to every domain name with an encrypted uri variable to prove it is
> signed on which causes each host included in the single sign on to
> assign an auth cookie to the browser.
Inste
16 matches
Mail list logo
