[RFC] Mason-based application framework, kindof

2002-01-27 Thread James G Smith
I'm working on putting together a site that can handle existing system management functions as well as allow for easy expansion by people that might not know how the core of the site works. In the process, I've come up with an interesting division of labor and a module. For now, I'm calling the

Re: DataBreeze for MySQL/ModPerl/Apache

2002-01-27 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Joe Junkin wrote: Feedback from the Perl/ModPerl/Apache community is important. [snip] You may download the software for evaluation at http://www.databreeze.com html titleDataBreeze Download/title body bgcolor=white h2Select the DataBreeze Code version you

Re: performance coding project? (was: Re: When to cache)

2002-01-27 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi all, Stas has a point. Perl makes it very easy to do silly things. This is what I was doing last week: if( m/\b$Needle\b/ ) {...} Eight hours. (Silly:) if( index($Haystack,$Needle) m/\b$Needle\b/ ) {...} Twelve minutes. 73, Ged.

Re: Apache::args vs Apache::Request speed

2002-01-27 Thread Joe Schaefer
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, I've run the benchmark and it wasn't the case. Did it change recently? Or do you think that the benchmark is not fair? we are talking about this item http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Apache_args_vs_Apache_Request Right- param() was

Re: Apache::args vs Apache::Request speed

2002-01-27 Thread John Siracusa
On 1/27/02 3:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: param() was rewritten as XS about 6-8 months ago; since then I've benchmarked it a few times and found param() to be a bit faster than args(). We'll be releasing a 1.0 version of libapreq as soon as Jim approves of the current CVS version. Did I just