On 1/27/02 3:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> param() was rewritten as XS about 6-8 months ago; since then I've benchmarked
> it a few times and found param() to be a bit faster than args().  We'll be
> releasing a 1.0 version of libapreq as soon as Jim approves of the current CVS
> version.

Did I just read that there's a new version of libapreq coming?  If so, will
it:

a) eliminate the current confusion between

    J/JI/JIMW/libapreq-0.33.tar.gz

and

    D/DO/DOUGM/libapreq-0.31.tar.gz

by creating a unified libapreq distribution with a version number greater
than both of the above, and

b) actually work in Mac OS X (please please please!)

(See: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01124.html)

-John

Reply via email to