On 1/27/02 3:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > param() was rewritten as XS about 6-8 months ago; since then I've benchmarked > it a few times and found param() to be a bit faster than args(). We'll be > releasing a 1.0 version of libapreq as soon as Jim approves of the current CVS > version.
Did I just read that there's a new version of libapreq coming? If so, will it: a) eliminate the current confusion between J/JI/JIMW/libapreq-0.33.tar.gz and D/DO/DOUGM/libapreq-0.31.tar.gz by creating a unified libapreq distribution with a version number greater than both of the above, and b) actually work in Mac OS X (please please please!) (See: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01124.html) -John