On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
> I have been thinking about a reorganization of the Apache/Perl modules for
> a while, and have come to the conclusion that it would probably be a good
> idea. Please tell me what you think about this proposal.
>
> Per Einar, I have cut most your em
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 07:02 AM, Eric Frazier wrote:
> The big points I want to achieve right now, is to make everything I
> write
> OOP, separate HTML from code as much as possible, and to not make it
> impossible to deal with for the people I work with who don't know as
> much
> perl
Dodger opined on the :
> Grr. Why can't people just write bloody applications with HTML in them
> instead of spending so much energy tryuing to find a way to avoid writing
> any HTML?
Because I don't want to have to go find a!@#$*^$ Perl programmer every time
the marketing department or a custom
Hi,
I think mostly it is about having standards and in a business env making it
so that people who only know part of the picture can still work on the
project as a whole. Sounds like OOP huh? HTML in perl scripts just messes
that whole thing up, like I said before, our fearless leader can mess up
At 01:06 PM 6/16/02 -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Eric Frazier wrote:
>
>> I have been looking into HTML::Template which is a lot simper than Embed
>> perl or the template tool kit. I am wondering if anyone has experence with
>> using both of these with Registry.pm
>
>I do! Back
Grr. Why can't people just write bloody applications with HTML in them
instead of spending so much energy tryuing to find a way to avoid writing
any HTML?
I mean, it's not that hard. Formulate what you want parts to do, make a sort
of vanilla, unformatted output here-doc ior template file for e
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Eric Frazier wrote:
> I have been looking into HTML::Template which is a lot simper than Embed
> perl or the template tool kit. I am wondering if anyone has experence with
> using both of these with Registry.pm
I do! Back when I worked for Jesse Erlbaum (the author of
CGI::
Hi,
I am still working on building a framework, design plan for this busy site I
am working on. It is a total revamp so I have the chance to do things "right"
I have been looking into HTML::Template which is a lot simper than Embed
perl or the template tool kit. I am wondering if anyone has expe
At 18:01 16.06.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > >Also, a module map might be a good thing to create, i.e. an improved
> > >version of this: http://perl.apache.org/src/apache-modlist.html.
> >
> > Well, because the module list has now moved into the Perl Module List
> > entirely, we are removing it
> >Also, a module map might be a good thing to create, i.e. an improved
> >version of this: http://perl.apache.org/src/apache-modlist.html.
>
> Well, because the module list has now moved into the Perl Module List
> entirely, we are removing it with the new site.
What I meant was that since you c
At 17:01 16.06.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > I have been thinking about a reorganization of the Apache/Perl modules
>for
> > a while, and have come to the conclusion that it would probably be a
>good
> > idea. Please tell me what you think about this proposal.
>
>Sounds fine to me. I would sugg
> I have been thinking about a reorganization of the Apache/Perl modules
for
> a while, and have come to the conclusion that it would probably be a
good
> idea. Please tell me what you think about this proposal.
Sounds fine to me. I would suggest creating a brief document with
naming guidelines
> There is still one GUI tool I would definitely love to have: An HTML
> WYSIWYG editor that lets me edit templates while they are filled with
> example data
You can do this right now with HTML_Tree or HTML::Seamstress. Since
Dreamweaver has an extension mechanism, you can probably add support t
Hi
First thanks for your answer.
At 14:05 16.06.2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
>However, the major problem, as I see it is, is simply that people already
>KNOW modules by a specific name and changing them is probably going to lead
>to confusion and possibly even some bitterness. If I'm setting up a new
>server I'm going to be m
I have been thinking about a reorganization of the Apache/Perl modules for
a while, and have come to the conclusion that it would probably be a good
idea. Please tell me what you think about this proposal.
Per Einar, I have cut most your email only for convenience...
I agree with you. It would
Hello,
I have been thinking about a reorganization of the Apache/Perl modules for
a while, and have come to the conclusion that it would probably be a good
idea. Please tell me what you think about this proposal.
What is the situation now?
Currently, all mod_perl modules are, as you know, gro
At 19:26 15.06.2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > I think the most perfect web
> > development env would be a WO-style framework build on top of mod_perl
>
>You can assemble various parts of it from CPAN. Most of the perl O/R
>frameworks are not as ambitious as EOF, but Tangram is trying pretty
>hard. T
18 matches
Mail list logo
