-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 22 June 2002 12:57 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, My Mission(must accept it) is to retrieve xml-formatted mail, parse
thru char-sets in msg-body, if chars out of ascii range: generate err msg.
While I wade thru the apis could any
thanks matt, i'll get it(XML::LibXML) andgiveit a go.
__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the
convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own
Hi guys,
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks matt, i'll get it(XML::LibXML) andgiveit a go.
The subject line for this message was missing the RE: tag.
Just a reminder to anyone new to the List that there are packages
(and people:) which (who) might be confused by this...
73,
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote:
Old fashioned is right,
Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List?
My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for
an offer of employment which he is making then if it's legal, that's
the way
Hi there,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, John Saylor wrote:
Try as I might, I cannot get apache to run. It just keeps segv-ing.
Did you compile everything yourself?
Did you see the document in mod_perl-1.27/SUPPORT ?
73,
Ged.
At 11:46 22.06.2002, Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote:
Old fashioned is right,
Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List?
My 0.02 is that if someone has decided on the terms of reference for
an offer of employment which he is
Old fashioned is right,
Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the List?
Hang on Ged, I'm thinking that there might be a community opportunity to
develop a library of tools that will solve the obvious problem here. Would
it be possible to provide a solution for
Come to think of it, this is exactly what I did on my RedHat 7.2 system --
grabbed a Perl 5.6.1 RPM without noticing that it was for RedHat 7.3. It
installed fine, and Perl worked okay, so why not? Thanks for
straightening this up, Eric -- as Chip said, everything should have worked
fine with
On Saturday, June 22, 2002, at 02:46 AM, Ged Haywood wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Zac Morris wrote:
Old fashioned is right,
Can we decide whether this kind of post is or is not welcome on the
List?
For what it's worth, my inclusion of the list address on my reply was
entirely accidental.
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested
with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need to run
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will
need to:
1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas
said,
Apache::DBI can only work with that one)
2) You will probably need to run
Zac Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Honestly though Chip I have to pipe up here.
I was a gung ho RedHat supporter when I first got involved in the
linux world, and I still believe with it's RPMs and GUI tools it's
still the best for both new users and corporate environments, but
man, if
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Hallo!
Is it possible that PerlModule doesn't modify %INC?
With PerlModule CGI in the Apache configuration, all scripts with use
CGI produce warnings like:
Subroutine put redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/CGI.pm line 517.
Subroutine print redefined at
13 matches
Mail list logo
