Re: ssl encryption

2001-06-16 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Yes, it's possible. To achieve this, you should use asymetric encryption, and *not* store the private key in the server. Then, the question remains : how can I have the server safely decrypt on demand ?! one possible solution could be to store the private key in a remote server, dedicated to the u

Re: Driver to access the MS SQL Server database!!!

2000-12-13 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Edmar Edilton da Silva wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please, can anyone tell me what driver I can use to access the MS > SQL Server database? I am using the freetds_dbd driver, but It > doesn't work properly when under heavy workload, the child processes > of the apache server are aborted. I t

Re: RFC: DBI::Prof

2000-11-28 Thread Fabrice Scemama
It would be nice if Tim Bunce simply added it as a parameter to DBI's existing methods. Why not ask him? Fabrice Aaron Ross wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Stas wrote: > > possible SQL calls manually, so I wrote this simple profiler. Take a look > > and tell me if you think it worths releasing

Re: Microperl

2000-11-16 Thread Fabrice Scemama
ok so what about miniperl, which is used when building perl? Robin Berjon wrote: > > I know all that about Perl, and about PHP (which I have no idea why you > mention here), that's not the point, at least not the one I had in mind. I > was thinking of using a smaller, less powerful Perl in the *

Re: Interfacing from Apache to Access

2000-07-11 Thread Fabrice Scemama
DBD::Proxy does work the way you describe it. I've used it with succes to address MSSQL DBs. So far, with Access I met a few difficulties with memos (Access' BLOBs), but maybe I didn't find the way to do it. Fabrice David Mitchell wrote: > > > From: Eric Strovink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Microsoft SQL 7.0 interface

2000-05-29 Thread Fabrice Scemama
You might use DBD::ODBC with DBD::Proxy as well; should be easier to setup, but probably less efficient than FreeTDS. Kee Hinckley wrote: > > At 5:45 PM -0500 5/26/00, Wang, Pin-Chieh wrote: > >Any body knows how to access Microsoft SQL/on NT from Apache on Linux ? > >Our data base is running on

Easy Examples to Get Started

2000-03-28 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Hi Mod_Perlers! I'm currently reading Stas's book (big thanks to all of you who contributed to this masterpiece -- it's great). But you never get tired of Good Things, and I was wondering if some very easy and commented mod_perl scripts were available, as a way to get started faster and better.

Re: Commercial app demo

2000-02-09 Thread Fabrice Scemama
There's another way. We can't build pre-compiled modules easily, but even when you code in C or Java, desassemblers can extract some source from the binaries you deliver. As far as perl scripts are concerned, a workaround consists in trivially removing all comments and \n from the source, which ma

Re: www.modperl.com

2000-01-31 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Come on, folks! www.modperl.com is a nice open source initiative. There's no specific rule about what should and what should not be put in a open source web site. We'll enjoy modperl.com just as we already enjoy perl.apache.org ! "Paul J. Lucas" wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Gunther Birznieks

Re: [JOB] ground-floor opportunity with ownership stake

2000-01-09 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Methinks certain `job' offers should be filtered... Having several mod_perl engineers work for free for five months, most businesses should be quite prosperous, indeed ;-) Not my business anyway. David Harris wrote: > > We have an outstanding ground-floor opportunity for the right person. Must h

Re: Another IE5 complaint

1999-11-23 Thread Fabrice Scemama
if we let them do every damn thing crosses their dumb minds, we are in for long-time troubles ;( Fabrice Scemama Eric Cholet wrote: > > > Am I the only battling service vendor who actually feels good when > > somebody bookmarks my website ? > > I can absorb the overhead

Re: Another IE5 complaint

1999-10-03 Thread Fabrice Scemama
Greg Stark wrote: > (snip) > > Can the gimp save .ico files? How big and what colours etc does IE5 > expect > these to be anyways? > > -- > greg the GIMP can do it. It's a GIcon; should do the trick to win32 users. But why should we give IE5 favicon.ico's anyway ? sounds like another ms-made b