Re: Authen::Smb

1999-10-01 Thread Matt Arnold
> I can't even get Authen::Smb to work on its own. I wrote (more like copied) > a simple test script right out of the perldoc for Authen::Smb and I only get > error level one. Is there something that this depends on that I'm unaware > of??? Thanks. > > Derric L. Tubbs > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Consi

please comment on new art for perl.apache.org

1999-10-10 Thread Matt Arnold
I have created a new page layout/template for perl.apache.org. You can take a look at it at http://www.novia.net/~marnold/mod_perl/sample_3/ Please let me know if you think it's suitable for use on perl.apache.org. If not, how could it be improved? And if the majority hates it, I can certainly

[SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-12 Thread Matt Arnold
I'm sorry for posting my "how 'bout this art" message without giving any explanation of my intentions. I want to see a wholly redesigned mod_perl site. But there's a lot of effort which needs to be spent before we achieve perfection. And not everyone will agree on how to achieve this end. Whil

RegistryLoader causes "subroutine redefined" errors on import?

1999-10-19 Thread Matt Arnold
I know this topic has been discussed to death, but I think I can add something new. :-) Upon using Apache::RegistryLoader, I noticed my error logs started filling up with the dreaded "subroutine redefined" error. These errors occur at the moment my scripts scripts are preloaded using Apache::Re

Re: Apache::RegistryLoader and full paths

1999-11-25 Thread Matt Arnold
Nicolas MONNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez: > Apparently, the Apache::RegistryLoader man page states that you have to > point a script by it's URI, or IOW, relative to the ServerRoot. > > But what happens when you have several virtual hosts? Isn't there a way to > preload scripts based on their full

Re: [OT slightly] mod_perl developers (do they exist?)

2000-03-27 Thread Matt Arnold
From: Victor Zamouline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 5:44 PM > - In 18 months, about 50 companies (including HP, Philips, etc.) => about > 500 trainees (most of them sort of database programmers), I did not meet **a > single one** who had ever **heard about the existence**

performance mongers: since when is using CGI.pm or Apache::Registry dishonorable?

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Arnold
Many messages on this list perpetuate the notion that usage of CGI.pm and Apache::Registry is for beginners. Popular opinion is that you're not a leet mod_perl h@x0r until you wean yourself from CGI.pm and Apache::Registry and "graduate" to the Apache API. With this in mind, there have been many

Re: performance mongers: since when is using CGI.pm or Apache::Registry dishonorable?

2000-03-29 Thread Matt Arnold
I came across poorly in my original message. Some of my wording (e.g. l33t, h@x0r, sux, etc.) was a poor attempt at trying to make the message entertaining. :-( I feel badly that my poor wording and/or extreme tone is getting in the way of the intent. I sincerely want to learn the performance