Re: SQL log analyzer for Apache::DBILogger

2001-02-06 Thread chicks
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, T.J. Mather wrote: > I have a script that reads the logs from the database and dumps it out > to a flat file in the standard format Apache uses when writing > access_log, then I run a program called webalizer on it. I actually > don't use Apache::DBILogger, but the database ta

Re: SQL log analyzer for Apache::DBILogger

2001-02-05 Thread chicks
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, G.W. Haywood wrote: > On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Sometime in the next month I need to embark on a log analyzer for the logs > > we've been accumulating for many moons via Apache::DBILogger. Has anyone > > made any effort to do such a thing already? I'v

SQL log analyzer for Apache::DBILogger

2001-02-05 Thread chicks
Sometime in the next month I need to embark on a log analyzer for the logs we've been accumulating for many moons via Apache::DBILogger. Has anyone made any effort to do such a thing already? I've dug around the web for a while and come up with zilch. -- Those who cannot remember the past ar

Re: perl calendar application

2001-01-07 Thread chicks
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Blue Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> espoused: > Eh, I'm prepared to take my lynching, but I'd just like to remind > everyone that there's nothing at all wrong with using PHP for things > like this. You'll never be a worse person for learning something new, > and the overheard require

Re: perl calendar application

2001-01-06 Thread chicks
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Jim Serio wrote: > Why not just write one to suite your needs? If you want one > so tightly integrated to your other products, it's almost > always better to custom write it yourself. Or hack up a freeware > version. I'd really like to hack on a freeware version, but it'd be n

perl calendar application

2001-01-05 Thread chicks
I've looked around the web for perl-based calendar applications for several hours. There are a significant number out there -- I've personally checked out a dozen, but they are generally pretty pathetic. Even most of the ones you can pay for are ugly and have very limited functionality. WebTre

Re: Apache 1.3.14 and Mod_Perl

2000-10-18 Thread chicks
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Roger Espel Llima wrote: > It looks to me like perl.apache.org is explicitly blocking wget > requests. If I do the request manually with netcat, sending the same > headers wget sends, it fails: Why is wget considered so evil? -- "The number of Unix installations has grow

Re: Apache 1.3.14 and Mod_Perl

2000-10-17 Thread chicks
On 17 Oct 2000 Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 23:59 16/10/2000 -0700, Annette wrote: > > How do I install the latest version of Mod_Perl? Every time I try to > > install it I receive a message stating I need Apache 1.3.0 and then > > it aborts. I tried Mod_Perl version 1.19, 1.21, a

Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails

2000-09-08 Thread chicks
On 7 Sep 2000 Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > This is neither necessary nor sufficient. Please stop with this > nonsense. An email address can have ANY CHARACTER OF THE PRINTABLE > ASCII SEQUENCE. An email address NEVER NEEDS TO GET NEAR A SHELL, so > ALL CHARACTERS ARE SAFE. Clear? Man, if I see ONE